The Unorthodox Website Blog

Diana, the revolutionary princess

06 Oct


Click to enlarge photos of Diana

Diana, former ‘Prisoner of Wales’ as she posthumously refers to herself, has commented on the current financial crisis (see her comment to my last blog). Although this surprised me, as she has usually confined her comments to my blogs about herself speaking from the after-life thru her voice channel, Andrew Russell-Davis, it should really come as no surprise.

For those who don’t know what I’m talking about, Diana communicates thru her voice channel, Andrew Russell-Davis, first by a transcribed book and channeled messages also transcribed, but since 2005 with something approximating her own voice, speaking thru Andrew. This is a unique form of mediumship. There have been direct voice mediums who produced voices of the dead by constructing voice boxes out of ectoplasm, but part of Diana’s essence remains Earthbound, seeing and speaking thru Andrew, with his permission of course. She expects to be doing this until 2010, and her mission is to speak to her two boys, thru Andrew, and also to tell the truth about things. About her life, the events which happened in Paris in 1997, about the future of the Monarchy (or lack of it), and about the reality of life after death.

She has dictated her posthumous autobiography (this must be a first!) ‘She Won’t Go Quietly’ (The Uncensored Diana) on her new website:  This was first transcribed by Andrew, but on the new site Diana herself is reading it out. Also on the site are many channeled interviews with American medium Rose Campbell (the podcasts). In all these Diana speaks in a slightly lower tone than in life, thru Andrew’s vocal chords. But all who knew her or heard her speak can recognize the nuances of speech, the phrasing, the emotions (especially when speaking of Wills and Harry), and can feel the energy of Diana.

Diana when on this Earth became something of a revolutionary, certainly as far as the Royal Family were concerned. Earl Howe called her ‘a loose cannon’. Certainly she undermined everything the Royal Family stood for.

Born Lady Diana Spencer, she was a teacher and a nanny before marrying Prince Charles, and has described herself as a Sloane Ranger.

Only 19 when she became ‘Prisoner of Wales’, with no life of her own, she discovered that Charles, like most other royal husbands, had a mistress – Camilla. Listen to Diana in her own words tell how there were three people in her marriage right from the very beginning.

But Diana was a rebel. Royal wives are not supposed to create trouble, they are meant to keep quiet about such things as mistresses, and not supposed to go on Panorama and talk about them, or say what’s good for the gander is also good for the goose. Diana was not popular in the Royal household. The Queen made her marriage last, but Diana and the new generation of royals were not going to put up with what she puts up with.

But that was not the only way Diana rebelled, nor the only reason the family disliked her. She claims not to be political, but almost everything she did was political. Shaking hands with AIDS patients when nobody else was prepared to do so was a bold political and social statement, taking the princes to meet homeless people was most definitely a political statement, teaching them that there are people not nearly as fortunate and privileged as themselves.

Diana even made William and Harry line up and pay for things in shops like Marks & Spencers, and for rides in Disneyland, although they could have been whisked thru both without either cash or queues. This was a revolutionary thing to do: here was the mother of a future King teaching him that, far from having a divine right to rule, he was no better than anybody else, just more fortunate than most.

Towards the end of her life Diana became more overtly political. She got involved in the campaign against landmines, which ruffled feathers in very high places. Many think this is why she died Paris, only a week or so after making a statement that Tony Blair’s Labour government would be better on the landmines issue than John Major’s Tory government. Nicholas Soames commented that these sort of political statements could not be allowed from the mother of a future King, even if she had been stripped of her royal title. According to Diana, he too described her as a ‘loose cannon’ on occasions.

Diana was no ‘loose cannon’, she was perfectly well aware of what she was doing. Undermining the Monarchy and the Establishment which controlled it. If she had not died in Paris, her next project was to be about Palestinian refugees, another contentious political issue.

Now mothers of future Kings are not supposed to do any of these things. They are expected to be the loyal wife to their husband, ignoring their infidelities, and teach their sons that they are born to rule the kingdom one day, i.e. that they are better than the rest of us. They are not supposed to drag their sons round homeless hostels, make them queue up and handle dirty cash, or get involved in political issues like landmines which the Establishment would find embarrassing.

In one of the posthumous interviews Diana comments that when Charles was with Camilla, Diana was not at home ‘playing tiddly-winks. There’s a bit more to me than that.’ Indeed there is, and Diana has admitted she herself had an affair with James Hewitt.

(The Queen was once found with a man in her bedroom, but claimed he climbed in thru the window. This is probably true, though shows a remarkable lack of security at the Palace.)

What Diana has written in her comment to my last blog is consistent with what she did in life, and what she has said in the post-humous interviews with Rose Campbell.

Her experience of being born into a wealthy, privileged family and then marrying into the royal household has opened her eyes to the inequality and injustices in the world. Diana admits she was no saint when on Earth, she could be a bitch. Staff were sacked by her when in a bad mood, or because of petty jealousies – such as the nanny who became too close to William and Harry. Diana died the same time as Mother Teresa, but the two women were very different. Diana was no Mother Teresa.

Nevertheless, Diana, loose cannon or not, was a constant thorn in the side of the Establishment, and still is. From beyond the grave she forecasts the end of the Monarchy, and with the wisdom gained from her life as Diana and in the world beyond, she now tells us we must create a fairer world, even talking about the destruction of capitalism and the world being forced into adopting a more ‘communistic/socialistic’ system.

As Diana said in that famous Panorama interview, ‘She will NOT go quietly’!

33 Responses to “Diana, the revolutionary princess”

  1. 1
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello Tony,
    Thank you very much for your personal compliments but also for providing a concise and informative summary of things.
    I recognise that whilst it is only an opinion expressed by me of course, perhaps within it are indeed aspects of future happenings, time will tell but certainly I feel I have drawn attention to a great many valid points, worthy of being explored individually in greater depth to determine which ones are viable and which ones for one reason or another are not.

    I appreciate I became involved in political and well more to the point controversial issues but it was always in an humanitiarian capacity.

    As I said in life about myself, I wasn’t a political animal but I cared about people and the society generally albeit supportive of the minority as opposed to majority which affected my popularity and acceptance and most particularly politicians of course something questionable as I made it my quest if you like to upset the status quo and did so pretty successfully thereby making enemies and pretty powerful ones, indeed more powerful than I initially realised … the arm of the establishment being a long one !

    I failed to draw attention to the fact that so too the Roman Catholic church houses many invaluable assets, artificats of various kinds … even the Vatican Palace itself and its own uniformed guards as well as gold in most if not all of its places of worship and for what exactly ? Gold that WOULD CERTAINLY if sold off, help to provide more than adequate funding for all as opposed to the select few ! I can’t help wondering if God himself might not be more appreciative of this than seeing his human representatives robed out in finery amidst pomp and ceremony even providing armour – plated run arounds for them… and … The Crown Jewels themselves sold off would raise a penny or two naturally though I suppose I can’t see either of these things happening even if Wills is not King or Charles come to that !”
    With love from,
    Diana xx

  2. 2
    Tony Says:

    The last Pope who wanted to sell off the Vatican treasures to help the poor died under mysterious circumstances a few days after being inaugurated – Pope John Paul I.

  3. 3
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello Tony,
    Anyone seen to be upsetting the status quo of things is a problem and problems need solving … so something Pope John Paul l, Benazir Bhutto, Martin Luther King, Ghandi, his daughter Indira and I believe her son too, J.F.K. (father and son) as well as Marilyn Monroe, Her Serene Highness La Princesse Grace de Monaco and myself of course along with many others personally discovered to our costs having done so in one way or another!”

  4. 4
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello Everyone,
    I am moved to point this out. I fully realise people will find it very hard to get their heads around the fact albeit through Andrew … “Diana Speaks” … naturally though not everyone of course but throughout history anything revolutionary has always been initially anyway greeted by scepticism.

    These song lyrics rather sum it all up …

    They all laughed at Christopher Columbus
    When he said the world was round
    They all laughed when Edison recorded sound
    They all laughed at Wilbur and his brother
    When they said that man could fly

    They told Marconi
    Wireless was a phony
    It’s the same old cry
    They laughed at me wanting you
    Said I was reaching for the moon
    But oh, you came through
    Now they’ll have to change their tune

    They all said we never could be happy
    They laughed at us and how!
    But ho, ho, ho!
    Who’s got the last laugh now?

    They all laughed at Rockefeller Center
    Now they’re fighting to get in
    They all laughed at Whitney and his cotton gin
    They all laughed at Fulton and his steamboat
    Hershey and his chocolate bar

    Ford and his Lizzie
    Kept the laughter’s busy
    That’s how people are
    They laughed at me wanting you
    Said it would be, “Hello, Goodbye.”
    And oh, you came through
    Now they’re eating humble pie

    They all said we’d never get together
    Darling, let’s take a bow
    For ho, ho, ho!
    Who’s got the last laugh?
    Hee, hee, hee!
    Let’s at the past laugh
    Ha, ha, ha!
    Who’s got the last laugh now?”

    Now let us remember that Wills spoke out publicly against a book written by my former personal secretary Patrick Jephson “Shadows of a Princess” because in his eyes it offended my memory and grateful for this intervention on his part, I penned a letter to William thanking him personally so albeit a channelled letter from mother to son. Andrew has the thank you note he received from William’s personal secretary then Helen Asprey. It speaks of how personally grateful William for it and is not the customary ” Your correspondence has been appreciated etc” type note. I knew it was time that my eldest son could know Mummy was still very much around so this being back in 2000.

    Now logically if my eldest is offended by a book penned from someone who knew me personally in life, why would he not be by someone pretending to channel me and therefore speak out publicly about it or at the least have someone else do so on his behalf as both my boys will be aware of my sites on the net, the You Tube etc, they will have been duly informed about them by somebody !

    I am quite sure that though neither of them can be seen supporting the fact, they know it is indeed Mummy and perhaps even Harry knowing it even more so than Wills, which is why albeit through Andrew I have a voice and enough of my own personal energy is retained, so that as has already happened of course, people who knew me personally in life who Andrew has met have sensed my being with Andrew but sensibly having their own personal reputations to protect in man’s current largely cynical world, therefore cannot be seen to be supporting him publicly but why else would it be happening if as the conclusion to the song tells it wasn’t geared up to be an eventual success. As after all to date anyway it certainly hasn’t been for financial gain as others have unsuccessfully attempted to do and it isn’t exactly the kind of thing one does to win a “Mr.Popularity contest”, more likely to be deemed by some as being deeply offensive and cut short by a fanatic’s bullet!

    Andrew has been given a job to do and is doing it and as I say at the moment anyway unpaid labour as has of course Rose Campbell who has worked tirelessly in her own personal efforts to get me out there and heard, I really am most grateful to them both as I am now to Tony promoting us all on his personal site.

    In the eventuality of it’s being known and welcomed, accepted and believed that “Diana Speaks” then my work can continue which will mean by example three hospices being built in London, Paris and New York in fitting tribute to me and my work as opposed to a ghastly fountain in a park which unsurprisingly proved itself in being non – functional and so later abandoned … I hated it and said so in a podcast to Rose to be heard at in the “Diana Speaks Out” area. I was pretty good at being my own P.R. in life so why should things alter now and that will be perhaps the finest and most revolutionary legacy of all, she who said she wouldn’t go quietly in life didn’t!

    Quite to the contrary infact proved to everyone the reality of life after death lending herself to upset the status quo once again as certain religious indoctrinations will be due a tremendous and powerful re – think as will scientists who only tend to believe and give credit to things logically based in text book fashion. To be able to once again be a voice in the wilderness of people’s mis – conceptions, misunderstandings about things, to expose myths others would have them believe, to dismantle various cover- ups of corruption as well as to offer comfort and healing in being a voice again where necessary and fitting for whatever cause needing that and on a more personal level my being afforded the means to speak to my boys and likewise they to Mummy and that is what I am most looking forward to doing naturally but enough reasons anyway for albeit though a male (I was always someone who believed in the strategy of confusing the enemy so a perfect vehicle for me to use ) it to recognised universally that “Diana Speaks”

    Thank you for listening to me,


  5. 5
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello,
    I am writing to say to people that the “Diana Work” is stagnant at this time whilst other issues clearly are taking precedence on the world’s stage, issues which as are meant to are affecting everyone at some level or another and hitting materialistic man hardest so where it hurts, his pocket ! It is something that inevitably had to happen sooner or later to curb ever increasing greed which was fast spinning out of control and therefore needed stopping by the only means possible, a global, economic slump which naturally is something that has already and will continue to do so affect some people more than others but something that as I say is, will be for a while yet and has already been felt by everyone to some degree or another. I cannot and will not make light of the situation which has clearly in some places already and others has yet to be seen as doing, reached crisis point and therefore something that is causing panic to people as it’s effects are being felt in many areas of the spectrum in pretty substantial ways but government spending for one thing needed curbing and this therefore ultimately will happen as there just will not be the funds available for it to continue and rightly so actually when you consider just what that funding often provided for, genocide being an example I personally witnessed the repercussions of in Bosnia and Angola !

    I fully realise of course hit hardest of all is the ordinary man in the street but this again inevitably and deliberately made the case so that eventually he will stand up and be a voice that is heard having been ignored for far too long. There will indeed be a necessity for a tremendously powerful re – think about expenditure generally at all levels as there needs to be for the world to survive but the powers that had hoped to control everything so to monopolise things have been likewise brought up sharp and corruption at the highest levels will be something duly exposed as so too will questions like is there need for a Monarchy which is something maintained at great expense by the regular tax – payer, does their purpose warrant this and I have to say that personally I think not and have always said Will’s having no personal desire actually to continue its tradition for reasons which ought to be immediately apparent to everyone. However if not of course, this is neither the time or place to elaborate upon or illustrate them for you … think !

    As a consequence of man’s becoming less focussed on material issues having suffered personally consequently from having done so, he will quite naturally become all the more enlightened which is something already happening albeit slowly of course but there will be no alternative for him but to do so ultimately in order to sustain and indeed maintain his survival. I have made many points in my various interviews with Rose Campbell at about corruption so by example thousands being spent on Cancer research but so too equally thousands earned by those who have more than probably discovered a cure but made it perhaps something only available to the select few. I am not saying this is fact but by example necessary medication is not something available to all areas of the world whose populations decrease dramatically every year due to A.I.D.S. and H.I.V. and this is fact so if it can and is happening in one area, why not equally so in another ?

    The “Diana Work” will continue and will be successful but at the appropriate time when a less materialistic man has as I say been given no choice but to emerge, at this time as he has proved in his lack of willingness to credit or believe, it would all be a waste of time and energy so therefore serving no useful purpose at all, words falling on deaf ears, not something therefore condusive to any actions being serously taken, he has become so wrapped up in sefishness and materialistic greed that he is not open to believing in, much less accepting of miracles happening! Therefore as I say as he has determined, it is not the appropriate moment for the work to continue as its meaning will be lost in the mire as sadly has proven to be the case. I even have to say that on my original site I purposefully directed certain “Channeled Messages” deliberately to people who I knew could assist me tremendously in my cause but who for whatever reason chose to ignore me, to view some of these messages is once again for the moment anyway back on the internet having mysteriously disappeared for a while so somewhere for those of you with a serious inclination to see further than the noses on your faces to visit. As the current economical situation clearly illustrates man is both ignorant and negligent and it is time therefore he woke up to these facts and this is precisely what is happening now but only as a direct result of his personally suffering from having not been so before now ! Here dated and timed is a copy of the kind of message I gave so read it now for yourselves and then see that “She didn’t go quietly!”

    (Date Posted:27/12/2006 04:10:44)
    ” Hello, I am speaking to appeal to someone to step – forward and not to be scared to do so. I told my brother by example that were I to die before him that I’d find a means to prove to him that I was still around and he joked with me about his not believing in that sort of thing, well seeing is believing and naturally on my personal sitehearing as further validation of this reality ! Likewise I cannot believe that my site has not been seen by anyone who knew me in life personally in which case where are you now when I need you ?. My personal site is after all one being promoted elsewhere on the net by its moderator and members and with good reason,
    I have things I need to say, important things! I have given up connecting with the Media after they failing to heed the desperate warning to themof the London bomb scares resulting in innocent lives being lost in them,a pretty cynical bunch at the best of times and in my relationship with them particularly so but disappointingly even Richard, so meaning Richard Kay has found himself disbelieving it’s me speaking … quite amazing, we were friends!
    I realise that eventually I will be heard by the right people but at the moment and over the past year this has not seemingly anyway happened, Andrew has not been contacted by anyone inspite of my asking someone to do so and albeit privately naturally, discretion being necessary for all too obvious reasons. I know by example if someone was on the net claiming to be channeling someone I’d shared a bond with and who was emotionally important to me, I’d need to check them out certainly and so find it quite incredible Andrew hasn’t been and particularly when people who did personally know me like Penny Thornton and Andrew Morton can vouch for his authenticity as I have said before. Mohamed al – Fayed has been written to also and someone so intent on non – acceptance of the official verdict regarding Paris but to date missing a golden opportunity to consult with me perhaps gaining valuable information to assist him in fighting his corner unless of course his emails have been intercepted and he’s therefore not seen them which in the light of their content might certainly be a probability to consider !
    I can only therefore assume one of two means of explanation for this apparent lack of real interest from people, one being the obvious, cyncism and disbelief in it’s being possible, no credibility afforded in it atall so a showing of complete ignorance or alternatively a sense of fear which indicates a tendency of there indeed being a belief in it all, or a willingness to consider even if initially a reluctance to accept it might be true but a hesitancy to act upon this realisation and find out which if so is pretty gutless actually!
    Odd though that given the fact things have been spoken of by me here before happening in reality that there might even be the question of ..if it’s all being real or not ? and as I say particularly when certain people can be contacted who can verify its being very real but it’s not only in the U.K. that these doubting attitudes have been illustrated, equally people in the media across the Atlantic have been contacted and to date chosen to ignore the obvious!
    I do hope that 2007, the energy of it might prove to be a lot more productive. Already live audience apperances are being organised in the United States so hardly something Andrew who is not masochistic by nature would be likely to agree to participating in if it were not true that through him “Diana Speaks” or he’d be rather an idiot wouldn’t he and in the event of it’s being “fake” setting himself up for exposure and the consequences of that … public humiliation, insult and ridicule! A point worth considering I’d imagine …………..but how sad that there are so few people in the world like Andrew, people with the guts and determination to believe in, stand – up for and support the courage of their convictions against all the odds and likewise how commendable to exhibit, show such a profound sense of belief, trust and loyalty to something of such profound importance, my channeling through him of course and therefore in someone who in life didn’t personally know me to have any emotional connection or bond with at all !I need You … You know who You are !”
    Thank you for listening to me,

  6. 6
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    Date Posted:02/09/2006 01:47:25)

    Diana was involved in political issues .. landmines etc as the U.S.and U.K. governments make and supply these weapons of genocide andgood earners economically!

    Diana drawing attention to them, a neglected issue until her public intervention called for them to be banned! President Clinton’s wife Hilary was a personal friend of Diana’surged him to do this against the Senates opposition … he eventually backed down under pressure from them … she attending Diana’s funeral representing the U.S.A. as being seen as a non – state affair, the President uninvited.

    Diana was under surveillance from C.I.A. AND M.I.6 in the interests of National Security, something she knew and had told friends and was receiving threatening, anonymous ‘phone calls, one friend Rosa Monckton with whom she holidayed in Greece a week before joining Dodi on the “Jonikal” in the summer of 1997….

    Rosa’s brother works for British Secret Intelligence ….

    Diana was in line to possibly receive the “Nobel Peace Prize” for her work in Angola and Bosnia re .. landmines which would have made her a highly controversial figure and certainly powerful, admired and respected.. more than she was already.

    When politicians speak, many of us turn off the Tv or switch channels and same with radio … when Diana spoke, people listened and Diana did her homework on things, never talking about something she was not an authority on which is why people listened to her and Diana had done her own homework on the Landmines Issueand was due to speak out about everything she knew knowing she’d be heard and the media would support her for a story .. they always did!

    Diana was someone with people power which made her more popular than the royals, minus the title being an un -official royal herself ….a few staunch royalists survive but in the majority Diana courts a larger audience even now in death nine years later.

    Diana also was in a relationship with an Arab, Dodi Fayed, eldest son of Mohamed al – Fayed enemy to the British Establishment politically and intended to involve herself in the problems in the Middle East,with intentions of crossing the Gaza Strip as she saw herself as a “Peace – Maker” and non – political by intention but an humanitarian but never the less her actions were political and she was proving to be dangerous!

    Her relationship with Dodi provided the perfect ammunition to set things in play, a great camouflage which it was hoped would work but time contiunues to prove has not but Diana herself pregnant ?

    Just an example of the bias the media who are controlled seemed so intent for us to believe until recently proven not so ….logically Diana wouldn’t hand such powerful ammunition to be used against her to her enemies the establishment and royals themselves or risk losing the love and respect of her sons who we all know always came first with her!

    As just one example though of misconceptions about things and in respect of what Diana has recently said herself, there begs the question what is the real truth about events of August 31st 1997 ?

  7. 7
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:01/09/2006 23:31:02)

    “Hello,I am sure people have been expecting me to say something and particularly at this time naturally and I do have things to say actually so will not disappoint you though what I have to say has disappointed me.

    Andrew as everyone certainly on my personal site anyway is becoming more and more aware and I have to say accepting of being my voice – channel.

    Recently I have been channelled by him on the internet radio station B.B.S. Radio in the U.S.A. and as a result of this interview Andrew has been emailed to the effect that I will not be welcomed by that internet radio station anymore as being too political in my viewpoints about things. Likewise my interview in the Radio Out there Archive files, so an interview with Barry Eaton a respected Australian journalist is likewise not to be heard amongst them and of course my original site has reappeared on the net suddenly out of the blue … but for how long ?

    So it has been made very apparent to him that it wasn’t indeed isn’t the fact that the authenticity of the channelling was doubted, it was the content of the channelling given itself that was the problem!

    Now let me explain Andrew has no control , no influence at all on what I am going to say at any given time, it’s as new to him as to the listener and it must be for authenticity or else as I say things will look staged and they are not, not at all, interviews with Rose Campbell to be heard at my other site ” Diana Speaks Out ” reached at and a further site in the midst of construction being

    If Andrew were not authentic and was solely concerned with self – promotion he would not be saying things publicly treading on influential toes obviously but he’s not and consequently at the moment anyway and as proven by this negative reaction and viewpoint, things are clearly being said by me that are making people uncomfortable, striking a chord and therefore a purpose is being served as more often than not the truth is difficult to hear and make people aware of, something in life I was good at doing of course!

    The stigma and ignorance regarding A.I.D.S. and H.I.V. sufferers as well as latterly the Landmines campaign were publicly exposed by me which equally did not make me a popular figure in all areas!

    My personal involvement with Dodi an Arab fuelling the fires already burning all the more, making me somewhat difficult to deal with alive because of course I had great troops behind me in my direct onslaught against inhumanity. Indeed, I had “People -Power” all over the world and was very aware of it. People listened intently to what I had to say and I also had natural charm and charisma which were useful tools for me to influence people .. men predominantly of course in influential circles which was a weapon I used to great advantage naturally which is why my circle of friendships was so diverse, so again I cannot deny certainly a degree of manipulation on my part but all in a good cause.

    There was nobody in public life doing what I did which is why I saw mine as being somewhat of a unique role and one I was dedicated to against all the odds.

    Reading the various precis in the forum area, these are clearly illustrated so there is no need for me to repeat them. The media ia an extremely powerful tool which can be utilised to achieve certain aims as I certainly was adept myself at doing but it also is responsible for influencing to a great extent public opinion as contrary to what some may imagine, many do infact believe all they read and of course journalists and editors themselves counting on this and dependent on it so do all they can to appear convincing but as regards Paris I now can say that this is something out of their control and here you will have to open your minds but although as is happening now and as has done there have been all kinds of delays in procedures determining everything.

    I have been biding my time but the truth of everything will be exposed and I am determined for this to happenand so naturally in ways that man as hard as he may try cannot interfere with or in any way change ! With all the controversy that the events of August 31st 1997 caused initially then and continue to do so nine years later it ought to be increasingly apparent that things are clearly not as they appeared to be and the truth as yet not been told !

    Andrew is not going to be the truth – seer, that responsibility to lay squarely on his shoulders would not be a fair one and actually might not be the safest option for him and I am aware of that plus of course as the attitude of the managers of “B.B.S. Radio” serve to determine, he might not be believed in at all or that all I do say through him is believed in causing problems in certain areas so his work will come in to power as a validation of things yet to be discovered but prepare yourselves for a series of shocks which will certainly bear a significant influence on your lives as you will be given reason to question who and what you can believe in anymore !

    I am determined purely on a personal level for the truth to be known as being something I as their Mother owe my children ….. an explanation and one that they can understand and relate to of why they lost me which certainly with the ones given to date they can’t and that is not fair to them actually … needless to say they knew Mummy wouldn’t risk pregnancy and being an unmarried mother, would have told them of her plans to marry having accepted first privately an engagement, only later publicly made these things known having established their reaction to them … my boys came first and everyone knows that … and certainly would not have been driven anywhere in the country or abroad by a driver under the influence of alcohol ! As I say to put the jigsaw pieces together to make the picture it is important to read the precis in the Forum Area of my site which are all extremely informative about all kinds of things in all different areas and for those of you more open – minded the Channelled Area of my site is extremely enlightening so this said for those who just see my personal site as another Diana – Picture Palace on the net, it isnt , not at all and hopefully this will be something proving to be more acceptable now as well as in the future and consequently appreciated all the more and therefore respected and Andrew listened to as “Diana Speaks!”Diana, a woman to be taken seriously !

    How interesting isn’t it in this precis I warned people to be prepared for a series of shocks considering what has happened globally in the financial arena, affecting everyone in one way or another naturally!

    For those who think this information from me has been doctored, you have the url for the site to see this part of it hasn’t been …

    I have however updated other information so it differs in this respect slightly from the original !”

  8. 8
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:31/08/2006 06:38:16)

    Diana always felt personally confined within royal walls, her home of Apartments 8 & 9 in “Kensington Palace ” representing for her albeit a gilded cage of splendour to those outside, for her trapped within it’s confines, a prison which is why she welcomed release from it whenever she could.

    Explaining how welcoming her personal work was for her and both during her marriage, the “Official Royal Tours” abroad although tiring and gruelling at times for her and incurring her to miss her children and latterly her solo tours after her divorce were for her
    means of escape!

    An early example of this being that having newly moved there from Buckingham Palace where she and Charles had initially shared his apartment whilst their home of twenty-eight rooms of apartments 8 and 9 in Kensington Palace were decorated and prepared for them, Diana went for a walk, wanting to see the shops in nearby Kensington High street and walked past the palace security barrier only getting 200 yards beyond it when looking behind her she saw two security officers following her, she quickened her pace, they did too and caught up with her as she was about to enter a shop, told her that they must escort her back to the palace away from the busy highstreet for her own security.

    Escorted back sandwiched between them, it felt as if she’d been arrested andher crime, trying to recapture a sense of the normality and freedom that had been hers in life as “Lady Diana Spencer.

    “Diana and her husband argued constantly about this as he forbid her to shopping sprees unescorted by security even with a girlfriend explaining to her that higher security personnel were responsible for this ruling and not him and he had no personal authority over their decision about this, something Diana couldn’t understand at that time, that the ” Prince of Wales ” was himself powerless to interfere but as she would later learn, even the “Queen” is controlled by others in much of what she herself says and does,herself a prisoner of the system and one respected by her as tradition dictates as something royals themselves accept without question.

    Diana was aware on the one hand of these security restrictions being implemented to avoid her being kidnapped and worse assassinated but at the same time as the victim of them, riled by their necessity for her and the perks of wearing the glamorous gowns, being materially comfortable and being waited on hand and foot were hardly compensation for the new “H.R.H. Princess Diana of Wales” who by nature was a free – spirited character.

    Diana Like other outsiders brought into the Firm as the royals refer themselves, finding the levels of confinement and restrictions imposed upon hera personal trial that has resulted in the family being strewn with broken marriages and unhappy associations and those new to the firm more often than not criticised not praised or encouraged.

    An example of the Queen’s lack of personal power being that she who is actually personally against divorce, brought up in an environment where it was considered unthinkable and frowned upon, leading by example to the exile to France of the Queen’s own uncle abdicating his throne for his love of a divorcee,in 1969 signed her own governments Divorce Reform Act making divorce easier to obtain and with no choice in this as the British Constitution gives parliament the right to pass any laws it chooses and she has no power to refuse them.

    “The Princess Margaret”, her sister, her daughter “Anne, the Princess Royal”, “Prince Andrew” her son and of course “Princess Diana” and the Queen’s eldest son “Charles” and heir to the throne, all being divorced!

    The royal marriage between her and Prince Philip not being all it could be, he entertaining a relationship with famous actress Merle Oberon andhis mistress for many years being the Queen’s cousin,”Princess Alexandra”, someone he like his eldest son with Camilla refused to give up and something the Queen had learnt to accept having no choice from it’s beginnings in the 1950′s until it’s ending in the 1970′s!

    Reason perhaps why she was not able to understand Diana’s inability to accept Charles’s relationship with Camilla discreetly. Now it can be seen as it has been pointed out else where on the site that the establishment rules and the Monarchy is a traditional figurehead and to a greater degree a tourist attraction and a lucrative one, popular in it’s pomp and ceremony as seen by example at the annually heldevent of ” Trooping the Colour ” all over the world.

    Diana grew shrewd and knew that as mother of a future King and back – up she had power and one she could use to show how victimised she felt she was by the royal family and played to the people, the ordinary members of the public to gain their love and support, something easy for her to do as even u – officially as well as officially royal.

    Diana had been a teacher’s helper and nanny and was seen as someone people could relate to as having experienced life on the other side of the royal walls and was natural, warm, compassionate and caring in a hands-on approach alien to the other family members, something the lady capitalised upon both in the United Kingdom and abroad.

    This leading to more invitations to her to attend functions with her husband and without him and the escape from the palace confines thatthese brought her. Diana was a people person and always prided herself on this fact and knew that her ease and popularity with the public was a cause of great resentment and jealousy towards her from other members of the family but having felt so betrayed by them something that Diana herself encouraged and divorced was free to do so at every opportunity and which she took advantage of whenever and wherever in the U.K. andon foreign shores.

    Diana herself in speaking out publicly on the ” Panorama Interview “, the text of which in full can be read in this “Forum Section”,had invited the freedom she sought which came in the divorce that followed it, though formal divorce being personally sad for her coming from a broken home herself and not wanting her sons to experience it,Diana making statements during the interview that made people warm to her, those not in the establishment who saw it as an act of damaging proportions to themselves and the Monarchy, which it was, the princess having no reason to show them loyalty in the same way their loyalty to her had proved to be non-existant.The people though saw what Diana intended the audience of the programme to see, an emotionally distressed woman, trapped in a love-less and false marriage and desperate to escape from it and someone who was determined to not disappear as she told she was aware certain people wished she would do but was preparing herself for stepping forwards in a new and positive direction in her life, telling of her wish to become an ambassador for the United Kingdom.

    A wish that fell ultimately on deaf ears being a decision that would have needed the establishments consent and was refused by them. Diana would have made a brilliant ambassador for the country being so popular and with wisdom gained from her experiences in life, able to use them in such genuine, unprejudiced and non-judgemental ways world wide but it would have increased her power and that was a problem enough without further encouragement of it given by anyone.As for the interview itself.

    Diana had it recorded and filmed secretly at Kensington Palace neither informing the Queen about it and only her private secretary a week before its broadcast so too late for intervention by him but even pleaded with Diana to cancel it and instead she refusing to give details of what she’d spoken about.

    once televised to the nation it changed all her relationships and associations with those in the royal family and certain advisers including “Sir Robert Fellowes”, the Queen’s private secretary and married to Jane, Diana’s eldest sister and other palace courtiers who were seen publicly for their incompetence in not realising what was going on, embarrassing them and reason for Diana’s own private secretary and press secretary to resign theirpositions with her.

    The programme had highlighted the problems around the Monarchy and increased even more Diana’s personal popularity with the all important public, theopinion of who’mcounted so much for her.Diana seen as the victim of an adulterous husband who had showed her little emotional consideration and feeling and trapped her in a marriage as a show of duty and protocol to maintain the image of the Monarchy and sustain its survival. Diana’s courage in standing up to him and to the establishment and royal house being something she was admired for having done, speaking out honestly about how things really were behind the scenes, for allowing the public in behind closed doors!

    A success publicly, privately it cost Diana’s friendship with Princess Margaret, the staff resignations mentioned and outraged her sons, William rumoured to have stopped talking to her for a number of days but near Christmas time it also provoked the Queen to write to her demanding that she and Charles divorce followed by one from Charles agreeing this was their only option. The damage done by her insinuating that Charles was not suitable to be King ….. ” It’s a very demanding role being Prince of Wales but it’s an equally more demanding role being King and because I know the character, I would think that the “Top -Job” as I call it would bring enormous limitations to him and I don’t know whether he could adapt to that ! My wish is that my husband finds peace of mind.” …………………—-Remember Diana unlike the people at the time knew that her husband had a mistress and that he’d no intentions of giving her up to be King and though separated still being married to Diana and she being the more popular of the couple anyway and with no idea that her death would make the way clear for him to marry Camilla so anticpating the major problems it would seem to at the time have presented…

    Charles having already told Diana he’d not be the first Prince of Wales without a mistress,making her comment about limitations a logical one !—–Diana particularly during the last years of her life and without her royal title, an act that again in having been taken from her had angered the people against the royals, embarrassed and humiliated them at every opportunity, gaining more and more popularity, love and friendship as the unofficial royal in the kingdom and abroad and did so with ease and determination hurting their pride and dignity and losing them respect.

    As an example the “Prince of Wales” in 1997 went on a high-profile tour of Germany for four days and covering the event from the U.K. being one reporter and one photographer, Diana five days later flying to Asia with 400 people from the media for the events coverage. The people power that Diana had being something always underestimated by the “Queen” who had been genuinely shocked at the global reaction to Diana’s death but remaining as other members of the firm all trapped in their gilded cages knowing nothing else and somethingDiana in life made her escape from, her sentence as “H.R.H. Prisoner of Wales.”

    An example of Diana’s life in the U.K. ( An impromptu brief chat with Diana)Television presenter JeremyPaxman writes of his meeting with Diana. as is the way of such things, Jeremy Paxman details the outfit Diana wore at their luncheon – “a pale-blue two-piece suit and was much taller than I had expected”.They then talked:

    Diana: Jeremy, so nice of you to come.Jeremy observes that her voice is “as smooth as cream”.Diana: Just the two of us. Can you cope?

    Paxman: I’ll try. ( ” A thousand male fantasies flashed through my mind” … )And so to the conversation.

    Diana says that an American airliner that had crashed off the cost of Long Island had “definitely been hit by a missile – that’s what my source says.”

    Paxman says “Kensington Palace”, the venue for the chat, is like a prison.

    Diana: No, more like an upmarket Coronation Street. As we go out, you’ll see all the curtains twitching.But sometimes Diana nips out in disguise (“jeans and baseball cap”). The newspaper vendor will say: “What you been up to now, Di?”

    Diana: “But they’re terrifically friendly, and if someone starts bothering me I just go into W.H, Smith’s, and the staff there are very nice, and they hide me.”

    Paxman observes: “It didn’t sound much of a life, but she seemed reconciled to it. A year later she was dead.”

  9. 9
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    Diana you are remembered in people’s hearts today.

    As in 1997 your soul took flight , on earth you could no longer stay.
    In your brief 36 years you achieved more than many of us will ever do, that is the reason all over the world today and tomorrow, always people miss you!

    No less so your adored boys who you loved so much for us all to see God bless them and give them comfort , the Princes William and Harry.

    It is hard to believe that you are really not here and seems so incredibly unfair, may the identity of those who are responsible for this soon be laid bare.

    There is nobody alive today with quite the same magic as you, someone who gave of themselves freely as was your personal obligation to do.

    To the sick, to the needy you were especially always there, when perhaps they felt lost, lonely and abandoned, forgotten, you showed them care.

    You were a voice that was heard and in this you were determined to be, your quest to uncover secrets hidden for everyone to acknowledge as real and see!

    This was the work for which you “Diana, Princess of Wales” will always be known, Watched by everyone and seen how one “Lady Diana Spencer” had openly and publicly grown.

    A victim of inner – insecurity and lack of self – worth you worked hard on yourself to lay these ghosts to rest, experience the teacher and life the lesson as a shining example to others who were suffering, you were one of the best!

    Only the good die young it is so often said and regarding youself something definitely proven itself to be true, forever and always all over the world as well as seeing tears of your personal heartaches and sorrow, we remember your giggle and smile too!

    Everlasting and powerful is your legacy of love, compassion, understanding elegance and style, an inner and outer beauty quite unique, pour moi “Lady D” tu es formidable, C’ est beau mais naturelle et toujours tres, tres chic!

    Andrew Russell -Davis / August 31st 2006

    On Single Life’People think that at the end of the day, a man is the only answer. Actually, a fulfilling job is better for me … I’ve got wonderful friends, I’ve got my boys, I’ve got my work’.On Ambitions For the Future’I don’t sit here with resentment. I sit here with sadness because a marriage hasn’t worked. I sit here with hope because there’s a future ahead, a future for my husband, a future for myself and a future for the monarchy’.

    Quotes from Diana Princess of Wales

  10. 10
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:11/08/2006 22:35:26)

    ” I have intonated very strongly that there is every possibility that if things are not done soon there could be a third world war, one person holds far too much power and actually is somewhat of a war – monger and I believe certainly is quite determined to be remembered in history as, so which is extremely disturbing!

    In my life I was not daunted to expose publicly and openly speak about and draw attention to various areas which had been either neglected or willfully ignored by the media and so consequentlywere relatively unknown to the public at large. This did not make me popular in certain areas naturally but this fact did not stop me from continuing to do sowhich is why of course in certain domains I was seen as dangerous, people listened to me, I had the greatest and most powerfulsupport of all “People Power” and I used it whenever and wherever I could!

    No doubt why certain establishment members called me a “Loose -Cannon!”It is no exaggeration to say that without the official title I was more popular than the royals which I’m sure you can imagine was not something welcomed but something none the less proven to be so by the tremendous, global outpouring of public grief over my death and subsequent funeral which worldwide drew an even wider audience than the royal wedding had done 16 years before.

    I still make the headlines with regularity now, my face adorning some newspaper or magazine somwehere, quite amazing actually but of course until the truth is exposed with regards to Paris, the interest in me will persist and even then I will not be forgotten because I was someone who’m people related to, more human .. seen as, than the rest of the royals even whilst amongst them with the title and certainly having gained my independence from them!

    This gained me even more supporters! I have said and I am determined that the truth about Paris be known as I have already said on my site and live on radio in Australia that it wasn’t a car accident, of course it wasn’t which is why there are so many obstacles being placed in the way of the official investigation exposing everything but ultimately the truth always does come out no matter what precautions are taken to ensure it doesn’t and particularly over an issue like this which is one so prevelent in peoples minds nine years after the incident itself!

    An indication that some kind of cover – up is certainly in operation and as time drags the excuses for its delay becoming all the more ridiculous as shown by the coroner suddenly being too busy to preside overthe case which guaranteed him public recognition and acclaim, quite ridiculous as I say but clearly a signalling that there is far more involved here than initially had been thought by the majority, not everyone naturally!

    A very real problem being that I am dead of course so can only channel through information to Andrew as well as others, naturally as I have said before there is safety in numbers in something like this which is so important and of course vital for validation at the appropriate time. The problem with channelling being of course that not all believe in its being possible but it is a wonderful tool

    I am able to use to tell the truth because of course I know things that are and have been hidden and can expose them which naturally is my intention to do and Andrew seen as a “Nut” by people in the media will have the last laugh when everything is told and evidential proof sought and proven and those that ridiculed him miss out on the exclusives and the opportunity to capitalise on things, some people who know who they are already have done so and people who knew me personally in life mentioning no names of course!

    Never the less Andrew will be meeting and speaking with the right people for the job soon and this again is something destined to happen for want of a better word and so therefore cannot be stopped! My site itself has proven to be very popular in all kinds of areas as intended, even the royals themselves are aware of it and are believing in it which naturally they would as there are things written about here albeit discreetly, so having to read between the lines butthat only certain people would know to be true and I also have to say that I do understand that at the moment none can personally speak out about the site and what’s written here but thank those who wanted to do so for considering it, I am touched by this and so glad you know it’s me speaking and I am very glad that my site has proved something to a family member too!

    ” She Won’t Go Quietly ” … I said that about myself in life and my God I wasn’t wrong was I though not realising quite to what extent this statement would play out to at the time but the point being that in life I had things to say and wasn’t daunted to say them and now this is equally true and I hope therefore that the person who has been looking for me finds me here on my site and then things can progress at speed as already it’s actually been too long and the truth needs to be known about a number of things and of course once the connection is made and valued I can and intend onbeing a powerful voice of guidance for the world as now I can be and in far greater a way than was possible for me whilst alive and this is something I want, for my work albeit differently naturally none the less to continue and in no less a powerful way than before … I want to help make a difference and see changes made knowing it’s important that they are before things escalate to proportions making a third world war inevitable!”


    An example of the pearls of wisdom to be read at

  11. 11
    Tony Says:

    Of course William, Harry and others who knew Diana must know it’s her channeling thru Andrew.

    She has said things only she and they could know for sure. Such as, in one of the podcasts, the revelation that she had words with William over the phone from Paris shortly before she died. William was unhappy about the pictures taken on the yacht with Dodi.

    Now I’m sure that hasn’t been reported anywhere, someone correct me if I’m wrong. Private phone conversations are not usually leaked to the Press, and if this one was I’m sure I’d have remembered reading about it.

    And all the details in the podcasts of Charles’ relationship with Camilla, including the fact he slept with her the week of his wedding to Diana. This is not public knowledge either, but Charles must know if he heard the podcast or was told about it, that only Diana could know this (it’s certainly not Camilla pretending to be Diana, and she’s the only other person who could know for sure.)

    William and Harry, if you or someone who knows you read this, please contact Andrew and arrange a private audience so your mother can speak to you. What have you got to lose, or have you been warned off? Whether you have or not, if it was me I’d do it. So I’m sure, in such a situation, would Diana have done it.

  12. 12
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:22/06/2006 09:43:42)

    Sworn Statement of Richard Tomlinson … Ex M.I.6. Agent !

    I firmly believe that there exist documents held by the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) that would yield important new evidence into the cause and circumstances leading to the deaths of the Princess of Wales, Mr Dodi Fayed, and M. Henri Paul in Paris in August 1997.

    I was employed by MI6 between September 1991 and April 1995. During that time, I saw various documents that I believe would provide new evidence and new leads into the investigation into these deaths. I also heard various rumours – which though I was not able to see supporting documents –
    I am confident were based on solid fact.

    In 1992, I was working in the Eastern European Controllerate of MI6 and I was peripherally involved in a large and complicated operation to smuggle advanced Soviet weaponry out of the then disintegrating and disorganised remnants of the Soviet Union.

    During 1992, I spent several days reading the substantial files on this operation. These files contain a wide miscellany of contact notes, telegrams, intelligence reports, photographs etc, from which it was possible to build up a detailed understanding of the operation.

    The operation involved a large cast of officers and agents of MI6. One more than one occasion, meetings between various figures in the operation took place at the Ritz Hotel, Place de Vendome, Paris.

    There were in the file several intelligence reports on these meetings, which had been written by one of the MI6 officers based in Paris at the time (identified in the file only by a coded designation).The source of the information was an informant in the Ritz Hotel, who again was identified in the files only by a code number.

    The MI6 officer paid the informant in cash for his information.I became curious to learn more about the identity of this particular informant, because his number cropped up several times and he seemed to have extremely good access to the goings on in the Ritz Hotel.

    I therefore ordered this informant’s personal file from MI6′s central file registry.When I read this new file, I was not at all surprised to learn that the informant was a security officer of the Ritz Hotel.

    Intelligence services always target the security officer’s of important hotels because they have such good access to intelligence.

    I remember, however, being mildly surprised that the nationality of this informant was French, and this stuck in my memory, because it is rare that MI6 succeeds in recruiting a French informer. I cannot claim that I remember from this reading of the file that the name of this person was Henri Paul, but I have no doubt with the benefit of hindsight that this was he.

    Although I did not subsequently come across Henri Paul again during my time in MI6, I am confident that the relationship between he and MI6 would have continued until his death, because MI6 would never willingly relinquish control over such a well placed informant.

    I am sure that the personal file of Henri Paul will therefore contain notes of meetings between him and his MI6 controlling officer right up until the point of his death.

    I firmly believe that these files will contain evidence of crucial importance to the circumstances and causes of the incident that killed M. Paul, together with the Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed.

    The most senior undeclared officer in the local MI6 station would normally control an informant of M. Paul’s usefulness and seniority. Officers declared to the local counter-intelligence service (in this case the Directorate de Surveillance Territoire, or DST) would not be used to control such an informant, because it might lead to the identity of the informant becoming known to the local intelligence services.

    In Paris at the time of M. Paul’s death, there were two relatively experienced but undeclared MI6 officers. The first was Mr Nicholas John Andrew LANGMAN, born 1960. The second was Mr Richard David SPEARMAN, again born in 1960.

    I firmly believe that either one or both of these officers will be well acquainted with M Paul, and most probably also met M. Paul shortly before his death.I believe that either or both of these officers will have knowledge that will be of crucial importance in establishing the sequence of events leading up to the deaths of M.Paul, Dodi Fayed and the Princess of Wales.

    Mr Spearman in particular was an extremely well connected and influential officer, because he had been, prior to his appointment in Paris, the personal secretary to the Chief of MI6 Mr David SPEDDING… (Any relation to Andrew Spedding, journalist at Daily Express who failed to seriously consider Diana’s London bombs warning 4 days prior to them exploding with the loss of 52 lives ?)

    As such, he would have been privy to even the most confidential of MI6 operations. I believe that there may well be significance in the fact that Mr Spearman was posted to Paris in the month immediately before the deaths.

    Later in 1992, as the civil war in the former Yugoslavia became increasingly topical, I started to work primarily on operations in Serbia. During this time, I became acquainted with Dr Nicholas Bernard Frank FISHWICK, born 1958, the MI6 officer who at the time was in charge of planning Balkan operations.

    During one meeting with Dr Fishwick, he casually showed to me a three-page document that on closer inspection turned out to be an outline plan to assassinate the Serbian leader President Slobodan Milosevic.

    The plan was fully typed, and attached to a yellow “minute board”, signifying that this was a formal and accountable document. It will therefore still be in existence.Fishwick had annotated that the document be circulated to the following senior MI6 officers: Maurice KENDWRICK-PIERCEY, then head of Balkan operations, John RIDDE, then the security officer for Balkan operations.

    The SAS liaison officer to MI6 (designation MODA/SO, but I have forgotten his name), the head of the Eastern European Controllerate (then Richard FLETCHER) and finally Alan PETTY, the personal secretary to the then Chief of MI6, Colin McCOLL.This plan contained a political justification for the assassination of Milosevic, followed by three outline proposals on how to achieve this objective. I firmly believe that the third of these scenarios contained information that could be useful in establishing the causes of death of Henri Paul, the Princess of Wales, and Dodi Fayed.

    This third scenario suggested that Milosevic could be assassinated by causing his personal limousine to crash.Dr Fishwick proposed to arrange the crash in a tunnel, because the proximity of concrete close to the road would ensure that the crash would be sufficiently violent to cause death or serious injury, and would also reduce the possibility that there might be independent, casual witnesses.

    Dr Fishwick suggested that one way to cause the crash might be to disorientate the chauffeur using a strobe flash gun, a device which is occasionally deployed by special forces to, for example, disorientate helicopter pilots or terrorists, and about which MI6 officers are briefed about during their training.

    In short, this scenario bore remarkable similarities to the circumstances and witness accounts of the crash that killed the Princess of Wales, Dodi Fayed, and Henri Paul.I firmly believe that this document should be yielded by MI6 to the Judge investigating these deaths, and would provide further leads that he could follow.

    During my service in MI6, I also learnt unofficially and second-hand something of the links between MI6 and the Royal Household. MI6 are frequently and routinely asked by the Royal Household (usually via the Foreign Office) to provide intelligence on potential threats to members of the Royal Family whilst on overseas trips.

    This service would frequently extend to asking friendly intelligence services (such as the CIA) to place members of the Royal Family under discrete surveillance, ostensibly for their own protection. This was particularly the case for the Princess of Wales, who often insisted on doing without overt personal protection, even on overseas trips.

    Although contact between MI6 and the Royal Household was officially only via the Foreign Office, I learnt while in MI6 that there was unofficial direct contact between certain senior and influential MI6 officers and senior members of the Royal Household. I did not see any official papers on this subject, butI am confident that the information is correct.

    I firmly believe that MI6 documents would yield substantial leads on the nature of their links with the Royal Household, and would yield vital information about MI6 surveillance on the Princess of Wales in the days leading to her death.

    I also learnt while in MI6 that one of the “paparazzi” photographers who routinely followed the Princess of Wales was a member of “UKN”, small corps of part-time MI6 agents who provide miscellaneous services to MI6 such as surveillance and photography expertise.

    I do not know the identity of this photographer, or whether he was one of the photographers present at the time of the fatal incident. However, I am confident that examination of UKN records would yield the identity of this photographer, and would enable the inquest to eliminate or further investigate that potential line of enquiry.

    On Friday August 28 1998, I gave much of this information to Judge Herv Stephan, the French investigative Judge in charge of the inquest into the accident. The lengths which MI6, the CIA and the DST have taken to deter me giving this evidence and subsequently to stop me talking about it, suggests that they have something to hide.

    On Friday 31st July 1998, shortly before my appointment with Judge Herve Stephan, the DST arrested me in my Paris hotel room. Although I have no record of violent conduct I was arrested with such ferocity and at gunpoint that I received a broken rib. I was taken to the headquarters of the DST, and interrogated for 38 hours.Despite my repeated requests,I was never given any justification for the arrest and was not shown the arrest warrant.
    Even though I was released without charge, the DST confiscated from me my laptop computer and Personal organiser. They illegally gave these to MI6 who took them back to the UK. They were not returned for six months, which is illegal and caused me great inconvenience and financial cost.

    On Friday 7th August 1998 I boarded a Qantas flight at Auckland International airport, New Zealand, for a flight to Sydney, Australia where I was due to give a television interview to the Australian Channel Nine television company.

    I was in my seat, awaiting take off, when an official boarded the plane and told me to get off. At the airbridge, he told me that the airline had received a fax “from Canberra” saying that there was a problem with my travel papers. I immediately asked to see the fax, but I was told that “it was not possible”.

    I believe that this is because it didn’t exist.This action was a ploy to keep me in New Zealand so that the New Zealand police could take further action against me. I had been back in my Auckland hotel room for about half an hour when the New Zealand police and NZSIS, the New Zealand Secret Intelligence Service, raided me.

    After being detained and searched for about three hours, they eventually confiscated from me all my remaining computer equipment that the French DST had not succeeded in taking from me.
    Again, I didn’t get some of these items back until six months later.

    Moreover, shortly after I had given this evidence to Judge Stephan, I was invited to talk about this evidence in a live television interview on America’s NBC television channel. I flew from Geneva to JFK airport on Sunday 30 August to give the interview in New York on the following Monday morning.

    Shortly after arrival at John F Kennedy airport, the captain of the Swiss Air flight told all passengers to return to their seats.Four US Immigration authority officers entered the plane, came straight to my seat, asked for my passport as identity, and then frogmarched me off the plane.

    I was taken to the immigration detentioncentre, photographed, fingerprinted, manacled by my ankle to a chair forseven hours, served with deportation papers and then returned on the next available plane to Geneva. I was not allowed to make any telephone calls to the representatives of NBC awaiting me inthe airport.

    The US Immigration Officers – who were all openlysympathetic to my situation and apologised for treating me so badly -openly admitted that they were acting under instructions from the CIA.

    In January of this year, I booked a chalet in the village of Samoensin the French Alps for a ten day snowboarding holiday with my parents. Ipicked up my parents from Geneva airport in a hire car on the evening of January 8th, and set off for the French border. At the French customs post, our car was stopped and I was detained. Four officers from the DST held me for four hours.

    At the end of this interview, I was served with the deportation papers and ordered to return to Switzerland. In thepapers, my supposed destination has been changed from “Chamonix” to”Samoens”. This is because when first questioned by a junior DSTofficer, I told him that my destination was “Chamonix”. When a senior officer arrived an hour or so later, he crossed out the word and changed it to “Samoens”, without ever even asking or confirming this with me.

    I believe this is because MI6 had told them of my true destination, having learnt the information through surveillance on my parent’s telephone in the UK. My banning from France is entirely illegal under European law. I have a British passport and am entitled to travel freely within the European Union. MI6 have “done a deal” with the DST to have me banned, and have not used any recognised legal mechanism to deny my rights to freedom of travel. I believe that the DST and MI6 have banned me from France because they wanted to prevent me from giving further evidence to Judge Stephan’s inquest, which at the time, I was planning to do.

    Whatever MI6′s role in the events leading to the death of the Princess of Wales, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul, I am absolutely certain that there is substantial evidence in their files that would provide crucial evidence in establishing the exact causes of this tragedy.

    I believe that they have gone to considerable lengths to obstruct the course of justice by interfering with my freedom of speech and travel, and this in my view confirms my belief that they have something to hide.I believe that the protection given to MI6 files under the Official Secrets Act should be set aside in the public interest in uncovering once and for all the truth behind these dramatic and historically momentous events.

    The above testimony was made to the French inquiry into Princess Diana’s death, headed by Judge Herve Stephan and subsequently ignored by both the inquiry itself and the media.

    Since testifying, Britain’s security establishment has hounded Tomlinson to the point where he now lives in virtual exile in Cannes, France.

  13. 13
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello ,

    Thank you Tony for being blunt about things, I also now intend to be but with respect to the Medium who informed Andrew about this so not mentioning her name.

    Beatrice I know that you told this person that you and the younger royals look at Auntie Diana’s site so meaning the original one naturally being and one
    now on the net again having mysteriously vanished for a while of course ( Since then two more created … the Diana Speaks Out Area and which is still under construction at the moment )

    … when you consulted her in 2006 and you personally will know whether this is true and you said it or not but I deduce from this that my boys are therefore certainly aware of it which is why of course I personalised many of my channelled messages to be read there !

    Tony is absolutely right, I am available to speak to anyone who will listen to me and trust in the fact hearing will be believing as you will sense it is indeed me!

    As I have explained previously, everyone has their own individual energy and Andrew’s therefore is quite different to mine as people who have spoken to both of us have verified !

    As Tony says nothing ventured, nothing gained pretty much but I add where there’s a will, there’s a way and if someone was claiming to be channelling my Mother, I’d want to check this out for myself actually and I am amazed therefore you haven’t …

    So we know who I am speaking to don’t we and it would not be made public naturally. would I honestly allow for this to happen bearing in mind who came before anyone and anything in my life and therefore respecting their personal wish for discretion for all too obvious reasons but I have said that the truth about things will be revealed after the death of Her Majesty for reasons which will be very apparent then and not before !

    So Beatrice hopefully you will forgive Auntie Diana for this small exposure but I am making it very clear to people Diana Speaks in ways which cannot be denied and it’s important for me to do that as after all this isn’t a sick joke being played at the emotional expense of two people who have already suffered the devastation of losing Mummy, it’s actually to prove to you both you haven’t and won’t as albeit through Andrew of course you will discover yourselves which hopefully as Tony says is something you will therefore decide to do!

    Lots of love from,

    Diana / Mummy

  14. 14
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    Date Posted:02/04/2006 19:43:37)

    Cheng .. My Original Guide says this about Diana.

    ” I will speak now …

    If you take three people to the beach, they will all have a different perception of the same location, one might dislike it, the other see the naturalness of it all and appreciate that and the other content to sunbathe or swim.

    Three different people all in the same place yet each finding a different perspective of the same place.

    It is likewise the same with the perceptions experienced by those entering the”Spiritual Realms”, some not ready, not evolved enough to fuse with it, they usually are the first to reincarnate to learn more in a different incarnation but to evolve themselves in preparation for the further evolvement that awaits them here.

    True the lessons their incarnation was meant to teach them has been served but just because you attend a lesson in the classroom at school does not mean that you absorb the knowledge from the teacher so there could be experiences usually mental and emotional that have been missed and need therefore to be understood which they will be in the new incarnation.

    An extreme example but to give the idea, a rich man in one life will return as a poor one in another and perhaps his lesson is to make himself rich again or to accept his situation and live with that, this will be his choice to determine once reincarnated .. a part of his new lesson perhaps?

    People like Diana, a rags to riches story and I do not mean she was poor materially, here I speak of richness of the soul. Diana was by her own admission not a scholar and actually ” ORDINARY ” and taken from obscurity into the lime – light at very young age, with no preparation to the life she left behind for the one she lead and she survived but nobody has any idea what that battle cost her, all but her physical life, Diana was nearly destroyed as her character was assassinated in all ways possible.

    By example, needing love and affection, married into a system known for its emotional reserve and that being privately and publicly, you cannot put a show on to the extent of being something you are not so professionally if it is not something that is actually natural to you.

    Someone with low self -esteem who most needed encouragement and praise and instead of which received criticism and abuse, someone in desperate need of understanding, misunderstood deliberately or otherwise … the list is endless and emotionally, mentally, spiritually left in rags but Diana rose to riches!

    Her ” Spirit ” strong she used her personal experiences to help and be there for others in a compassionate and unselfish way, she used her disappointments personally for the good of others which was not the easy option and took guts and determination that Diana had in abundance but her lesson, one of them was to discover and recognise this for herself as these experiences led her to do.

    Why then you ask did she die so young and in such a way ? …

    Well it was her destiny of course, she was a matyr and her death to have the effect it has had needed to be dramatic …… but ask yourself how many lessons already have been learnt from both her life and untimely death as people earthbound seeing it as being , one fact being at the time of her death there was less crime in London, the Royals will never be Diana not even William as he has been born royal and in that mould but they are more people orientated than before her intervention.

    Aids and Hiv sufferers not ostracised as they were by ignorance before her shaking the hand of someone with the illness, anti – personnel landmines banned… so much more … look how much one arisocratic but ordinary ” Lady Diana Spencer ” achieved in her 36 years!

    Her legacy will live on in history long after all royals dead, very much still alive! The reason that Diana touched so many people was the fact she remained ordinary but in an extraordinary way …

    Diana always true to herself in rags or in riches! Diana has no need to reincarnate as it is already spoken by people’s lips there will indeed only ever be one Diana. Celebrate you were to witness her in your lifetme!”

    A friend, ” Cheng “

  15. 15
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:11/04/2006 17:28:56)

    ” Believe it or not I feel incredibly sorry for Charles who knows as it will become increasingly apparent that his choice of future wife is not a popular or welcomed one in the firm and out of it which is and will continue to be of tremendous tension for him and indeed has a direct influence on his future as being “King” of the country and William has no desire to wear the crown!

    The support that he had hoped for has not been forthcoming and the boys themselves are for obvious reasons not in favour of Papa’s decision and would have preferred for it not to have been made official as up until now the couple have lived together anyway which has been difficult enough for them to accept under the circumstances of which everyone is aware.

    I support the fact that Charles is for once not bowing to the establishment but putting his personal needs before duty and obligation but …. well, this might have have been better done much earlier but then of course there would not have been a “Diana, Princess of Wales” and there needed to be for reasons now well established, the landmines and A.I.D.S. and H.I.V. issues publicised and acknowledged on a world scale as an example of what I’m talking about as well as other causes which were also brought to the people’s attention during my life

    Charles taking the crown ?….. I actually feel that the marriage over, the couple will remain quite elusive and become from circumstances beyond their control, reclusive! I do not see them ever being fully acceptable to the public in the manner that is necessary for a reigning monarch and his consort … an unpopular “King” will be an unhappy one and a lot of damage has been done to the institution of the monarchy that it will be very hard to recover from. Her Majesty will retain the position of Monarch for as long as she is able to and then I would imagine there will need to be a tremendous re – think!

    I would doubt either of the boys will choose to be representative of the monarchy in the future, tremendous, powerful changes ahead!

    My charity work would have continued unchanged though perhaps moderated to facilitate the circumstances I found myself in which would have been dependent on a number of issues but most importantly with first priority being given to the consideration of my boys. How they felt?

    It had after all become as well as as something of tremendous importance to me personally, a marvellous diversion for me from having my focus being on my failed marriage and subsequent disastrous relationships which everyone is very aware of! I had been able to give them all my attention and particularly having already just maintained six that I personally felt particularly drawn to and which kept my diary full but allowed me personal time with the boys and also to enjoy a private life … of sorts!

    Of course whatever I did made headlines so this was something I never was allowed to fully enjoy for one reason or another, reasons I understood but at times were hard to bear!

    I was in no desperate need for marriage though ultimately I would have settled down with someone and in time no doubt taken the plunge but I would make sure that I’d tested the waters first and as I say only wih someone who had the boy’s personal approval, they being after all the main men in my life always! William, particularly sensitive and having witnessed Mummy’s tears, would need to know I was not going to be hurt again.

    As to the kind of man that would be? First priority that he loved me and I’d not have reason to doubt it, that he and the boys would get along and that he would provide me with the emotional and practical security that I needed and had always found lacking in some way. On a more superficial note, in an income bracket that would make it impossible for the media to suggest his having hidden agendas in being with me and one that allowed for the good life to be enjoyed every moment in our time together!

    Now I wonder who such a man might be? I deally as everyone is aware I wanted another child, a daughter so he would have to be a willing father as my sign of “Cancer” being the maternal one. Who? Not hard to guess, the clue being … “Tell me Yes!” ( Dit – Moi – Oui … being the name of the “Repossi” collection which Diana and Dodi chose the ring from in the jewellers in Monaco.In Paris Dodi on 30th August 1997 collecting theone modelled to fither ring finger size )

    At the end of my life, I was with a man who loved me and who’m I loved. Someone who didn’t care who I’d been, wasn’t daunted by the opinions of those witnessing our love affair as incidentally we intended everyone to do!

    We were after all happy and wanted everyone to know it … those who doubt this? Look at our body language with eachother which days everything and is something natural and not something controllable! There will of course be those who question things about “Dodi” and I and considering how short a time we’d known eachother, quite a natural thing to do but we had plans that were going to shock people of course but first needed the approval of the two most important people in my life before being decided upon … something which of course never happened!

    Why do I remain so loved and remembered even now is easy to answer … I was real and I mean by this that I experienced things that others have and do but did so openly which was appreciated. I spoke of my eating disorder, exposed my suicide attempts, had a very public divorce, advertised my love for my boys and revealed my affairs! There was nothing hidden which of course made me more “Normal” than other royals who hide behind a respectable facade most of the time about everything! Consequently I was easier to relate to being “Real!”


  16. 16
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:30/09/2006 20:36:05)

    *Vehicle accidents* are used as a way of assassination precisely because they are such a common cause of death.

    It is easy for the authorities to claim that anyone crying foul play is simply a conspiracy theorist”. -David Shayler, Former MI5 Agent.

    ” I have only this to say, were this message and the others not true what possible reason for them to be given is there, indeed what purpose would they serve?”Diana, Princess of Wales ” Dodi and I having enjoyed a wonderful time together in the mediterranean sunshine at the last moment being the incurable romantics we were and so happy to have found romance with eachother decided to fly to Paris, the city of lights as known and also of course a popular honeymoon destination because it is romantic, everything about it in a unique way.

    I was flying home to London on the 31st ironically to spend a few days with my boys before school term started, they having of course been in Balmoral with their father and his family. Something I was looking forward too tremendously as I always missed them so much in time spent apart and of course Harry’s birthday was coming up so there was a present to buy and the ring to collect, one commissioned by me would be available at the Paris “Repossi Jewellers” in the Place de Vendome opposite the Ritz owned of course by Mohamed, so enough reasons to justify our last minute detour.

    People have said of course Dodi and I were just a summer fling, I think not actually when you consider he and I had spent no less than three holidays together in a matter of weeks as well as at his apartment in London, Park Lane and the Fayed Mansion in Oxted, Surrey.

    I’d also had a secret dinner date with him in Paris prior to our second holiday, the first us alone on the “Jonikal” which he’d invited me on and I’d agreed to over dinner at his apartment there staying alone at the Ritz Hotel on that trip. Dodi was a gentleman and treated me as a lady.So flying into France from Sardinia, we thenfound ourselves greeted by paparazzi so someone was indeed reporting our every move which became increasingly apparent to me during the time we were in Paris and that person clearly was someone involved closely with us and I had my suspicions which of course have been somewhat confirmed by the media.

    I had to be careful because as proven when I’d suspected my husbands infidelity in our marriage andspoken about it openly I was accused of having a wild imagination, being paranoid and even mentally unstable and I’d learnt from that ..(See statement made by Diana publicly in reference to these thoughts about her ! )previously having said in another message here on my site, someone able to play my cards close to my chest when needs must.. but I wasn’t wrong was I proven by his marriage to her!

    I’d had words with William who was as I have said very worried by my relationship with Dodi, he young, impressionable and naturally influenced by those around him needed Mummy’s reassurance about things so I did need to be in London and this was something very much on my mind naturally!

    Quote from Diana in life !

    PRINCESS DIANA:” I’m supposed to be dragged off any minute with men in white coats, so if it’s all right with you, I thought I might postpone my nervous breakdown to a more appropriate moment!”

    End of quote !

    I had helped Dodi to choose the ring from an engagement collection … “Dis – Moi – Oui” which means ” Tell – Me -Yes” so I was aware that he intended to propose to me and that would be before my flying home.

    I was ready and prepared to say ” Yes” or I’d never have encouraged the ring to be purchased by him at all knowing of its obvious significance.

    In a call made by me to Rosa,I told her in describing my time with him, “It was bliss!” and gave similar signals to Richard Kay on another call from the hotel that same evening,30th August 1997.

    Engagement precedes marriage and would have successfully silenced people insinuating for me that it was just a bit of fun as well as of course proving to my boys Mummy had found love again! This was important to me naturally and it also of course represented committment to me from a man, serious committment which was something I so badly needed as I was not someone who survived very well on my own and had been so let down emotionally for whatever reasonby the men I’d entertained romances with until Dodi whose attentiveness and devotion to me was amazing, comforting, supportingand very real!

    I also had my own self interests to protect of course, my reputation being something very important to me and behaving publicly in the way I had been with him in front of the paparazzi cameras something I was aware would be scrutinised and could not therefore afford to have it ruined by me and thereby handing powerful ammunition to be used against me by my enemies as I knew it would be naturally were I seen to have been just having fun publicly in this manner.

    It is true that I was not prepared for immediate marriage,so I mean setting a date though we’ddiscussed possibilities but there were things to sort out first. My first loyalty being to my children,I’d need their approval of it naturally and then of course would need to break the news to the royals which I knew was not going to please them at all but divorced and an ex – royal, something made very apparent to me in a number of ways of course,they’d not actually be in a position to do much about it and I knew that too which appealed to me greatly of course!

    I have also mentioned that Dodi had a cocaine issue, I would hesitantly say an addiction because that terminfers drug dependency and he was a spasmodic user and indeed in his time with me it had lessened and he knew marriage with me meantit would stop as I did not want my boys to witness it so close to home but involved albeitthrough my work with addicts and witnessing therefore the side – effects of its usage,
    I had confidence that with my help he would indeed stop using and of course through the work had pretty powerful connections in this area to assist me!

    There was no need for me to become Muslim in order to marry him, like me Dodi divorced,Suzanne hadn’t changed her faith either and the children we might have had ? They’d have been Muslim but being non – religious myself this was not a great issue for me. I knew already that my family and particularly my mother of course would be very disappointed by me but we were not speaking anywayand were never close … my brother actually said something rather telling at my funeral when he thanked God for taking me when I had joy in my private life!

    That was lovely and showed to me anyway someone I loved and who loved me inspite of exchanged hostilities between us in recent months recognised and respected his sister was happy! So as I say marriage might have been a long way off, though I doubt that far into the future but unofficial engagement absolutely without question! From the airport chased by the eager paparazzi of course we were driven to the “Villa Windsor”, home to the exiled “Duke and Duchess of Windsor ” and belonging to Mohamed.

    It was not somewhere I was keen to visit but Dodi insistent we did as he saw it as a possible future home for us, one conveniently close enough to the U.K. for the boys to visit as well as our tripping there because contrary to what might be imagined, I was not going to give up my charity work, it naturally would have lessened as hopefully I’d be devoting a lot of time to my husband and our new family, we both wanted children and whilst we were capable of actively being involved in their childhood.

    Everyone knows being Mummy was the role I was most fond of and one I’d never tire of playing. We were not at the house long because as I say it had a royal connection which initself put me off but also there was a haunting feeling about it which made me feel somewhat uncomfortable actually though I did see that as Dodi pointed out to meit had potential though it needed decorating, empty so long, changes would need to be made there!

    I have said before I’d have also made sure that Dodi would not remain as beholden to his father as I saw him as being in the future and especially as his wife! Enroute there we’d lost the paparazzi thank goodness so had momentary breathing space!

    Then we went to the hotel where I had my hair done whilst Dodi went and collected the ring which I tried on in the suite and then never saw again. We relaxed and of course knowing exactly the computer play – station game Harry wanted someone was despatched to buy that.

    We then decided to retreat to Dodi’s apartment where we’d change for dinner at my favourite restaurant and were horrified to find once again as we had on arrival at the hotel paparazzi presence outside in wait for us!

    As I say it really was like being on safari but they hunters and us the prey, not pleasant at all and I actually angered by it and frustrated because we’d given them so many photos already on the cruise, I really felt they might have respected us and left us alone … but some chance of that happening!

    They were seen off by Dodi’s minders and we relaxed quietly in the apartment and changed for dinner but on the advice of his body – guards at the last moment this destination changed as it was advised to us that we’d be open and vulnerable to the paparazzi eating at the public restaurant so once again found ourselves headed for the Ritz which again upset me naturally. Outsiders proving to have a lot more control over my private life than I did and that wasn’t fair but life often isn’t is it and Dodi and I were main headlines after all and meant and providedlucrative business which is all they were concerned about naturally. On our arrival at the hotel, remembering as I say that it was a last minute change of plan we were surrounded by waiting paparazzi which is when I realised that they were being tipped off but just who was their informant ?

    It had to be someone working for the Fayeds themselves, an insider, which quite unnerved me of course so I was on edge and now desperately wanted to go home to the sanctuary of “K.P.” and even the lively company of my boys preferable to the consistent hounding of us experienced here in France but of course couldn’t so eventually having been for a few moments trapped in our car we entered the hotels main lobby.

    Eyes of curiosity by other diners in the main restaurant necessitated us moving to the “Imperial Suite” again where I really told Dodi how I hated being this focus of constant and intrusive attention and he doing his best to assure me that in the future he’d do all in his power to protect me from it and I believed him which is why it was decided by us that we’d live abroad and quietly and privately as we could.

    Dodi as I say having a number of homes around the world and fortune enough to build one specifically designed in the event of this being necessary wherever that might be … at the time joking with him that perhaps the moon might bean idea but then even N.A.S.A get there too!

    Dodi and I did share humour which was so important and particularly for me at that time, I was never allowed to be moody around him for long, he knew just what to say to make me giggle!As everyone knows we left the hotel to return to his apartment for our last night in Paris, Ironically it turning out to be so quite literally but not in the manner of which we imagined it would be.

    Dodi had spoken with his father of his plans for us to leave the hotel which he’d tried to dissuade Dodi from doing as indeed I alsodid feeling it far safer for us to remain there but Dodi was determined for us to go … my baggage of course there as well as the ring !

    We left as arranged via the back entrance of the hotel to avoid the paparaxzzi at the front , a decoy limousine stationed there to put them off the scent but again someone, somewhere knew it and saw us, so they were soon in pursuit. Dodi doing his best to calm me down as I was pretty agitated actually which is why I can tell you we were not speeding and our driver not drunk at the wheel!

    During our whole time in Paris inspite of my being there and initially being at the airport on our arrival in France so knowing I was in the country… no police presence, no protection provided that we saw and of course in Dodi’s plan one of the bodyguards left with the decoy limousine so only Trevor Rees – Jones with us.

    We stopped at lights at Place de la Concorde and the car with no tinted windows provided the paparazzi with a perfect photo opportunity so instead of travelling the fastest route to the apartment along the Champs Elysee knowing there to be many traffic lights on it, Henri – Paul knowing every stretch of the route instead took a detour heading towards the Alma tunnel and finding an exit to the Champs Elysee from that route blocked by a motorcyclist forcing him to continue on to the tunnel entrance itself which suddenly was plunged into darkness and we hit something !

    I can only presume as there had been a car infront of us driving very slowly that it was that car but it oddly enough seemed to veer left into our pathway just prior to our entry of the tunnel and then the brightest light shone in the darkness into the back of the car blinding meand then directly at Henri – Paul through the front windscreen as a motorcyclist coming from nowhere sped past us but I assumed the one seen blocking the entrance to the Champs Elysee that Henri – Paul had initially been intent on taking.

    I sensed it had been waiting for us, there being no other logical explanation for its suddenlybeing there at all!

    Naturally as everyone knows the crash followed … I was however taken from the car pretty quickly unlike it has been reported but then medically attended to in the tunnel and later the ambulance which of course delayed my receiving the urgent medical attention necessary for me to survive a crash already claiming two lives andseriously injuring two more including of course “Diana, Princess of Wales” and mother of a future King ….so why the deliberate delays ?…

    For now I leave that to your imagination but oddly enough the ambulance crew attending me have never spoken out themselves but disappeared into the Paris night without trace…

    The truth as I have said about everything will out and that will shock the world so prepare yourselves, it’s one thing to have suspicions and quite another to have those suspicions confirmed as I did by confirmation of my husbands infidelity so who in the Fayed camp did I suspect ?

    I’ve said I play things close to my chest but I’m not wrong in their identity which will be publicly exposed soon! I will just add that the British Embassy in France is minutes away from the tunnel!

    This is something spoken of in greater detail in a precis about the incident in the Forum Area of my original site. I have already said that the crash in Paris was no accident albeit a carefully planned event to look like one !( In other messages more parts of the jigsaw are drawn attention to deliberately as well as of course many precis in the Forum Area dealing with the subject ) so I have little more to add aware that the media are soon going to uncover more still as proven by the latest witness stepping forward, already!

    My having recently stated and prior to it’s happening of course,there were indeed more revelations to come out and this then proving so and consequently that on my personal site ” Diana Speaks!”

    Andrew has asked me some direct questions and here are my answers to them

    :1)Was I wearing a seat – belt ? / No because it was a short journey supposedly to be anyway and I wanted to be snuggled up close in the arms of my man without the restraint of one.

    2)After the incident, was I aware of people present ?/ I heard a number of voices and there was an awareness by me of the tunnel being brightly lit which confused me as entering it, ithad been lit but suddenly waspitch black.

    3)Did I speak to anyone ?/ Incoherantly perhaps mumbled somethingbut no conversation no!

    4)Did I have thoughts as things began happening ? / Just one already said by me on my site … “They’ve got me!” and Iknew that I was the target and Dodi the victim !


    Comment found on the net ….

    ‘A friend in Paris travels to work every day through the underpass in which Princess Diana died. On the day of the incident she noticed all of the security cameras were turned to the wall and actually mentioned it to her husband. The next time they were allowed through the tunnel, the cameras were repositioned.(Anonymous / Paris 1997)

    Andrew’s Comment !

    This was not channelled to me at all but a thought that has struck me … What if the emergency ambulance crew were bogus ?

    Perhaps in the tunnel where it is known initially Diana was attended to injecting her with drugs to ensure cardiac arrest enroute to the hospital, hence not the closest to the scene chosen and why the ambulance stopped a few times on the emergency journey.

    Diana channelling to me she was D.O.A.and it was efforts to resucitate her that had failed !

    Perhaps the original crew swopped mid – route to the hospital which might explain its stopping enroute so that the original crew under threat to shut – up were replaced by secret service agents in ambulance crew gear and with orders to make sure that the patient didn’t make it so perhaps she then being injected with drugs to ensure cardiac arrests or simply not providing the necessary medical assistance for her condition … ?

    This would explain why the ambulance crew have never come forward with statements, even been called to interview, their identities a mystery!

    On arrival at the hospital the waiting hospital staff on alert and waiting for the delayed ambulances arrival with it’s V.I.P. PATIENT would be too preoccupied to immediately attend to the patient than to check on the credentials of the S.A.M.U. ambulance crew …

    It’s always seemed strange to me that even now when everyone involved with the incident in one way or another and even those who were not have all written books or drawn attention to their connection with Diana for monetary gain and yet none of the crew with her that night have ever done so …it might be that they were respectful humanitarians just doing their job on August 31st 1997 !

  17. 17
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    Date Posted:01/03/2006 19:04:31)

    ” I want to send a special message to you both with all my love, Andrew has not be able to communicate to you any other way as I am only too aware that had this been so, you’d have been unlkely to have received the communication obviously and so with no other alternative it is being wriiten , spoken by me here.

    There will naturally be more personal and private communications in the future and it’s important that there are but this is just one to say that I am very aware of the fact that you read my site and are believing in it thank goodness and which is why I have already said certain things that only you will know to be real and as I personally saw them.

    Andrew as one of my channels is himself not fully aware of them as it is not necessary for him to be, he’s just the middle – man but this isn’t to say that I am not extremely appreciative of the fact that he has been willing to play his part in this and his role by no means a small one obviously.

    I fully realise that there are and will be questions that need answering and I can assure you they will be, where there’s a will, there’s a way but I have things under control and I am aware that I must be cautious in what I say and particularly in a forum area seen and read by many people as it is a sensitive issue naturally and not my intention therefore to cause problems for anyone which would interrupt the natural flow of things.

    At the moment a lot of what has already been said here, last year infact, is only now making official headlines but these in themselves giving validity to the messages spoken of by me here so serving a very valuable and useful purpose which is why I am content at the moment to leave things as they are.

    The media being extremely helpful to me in this area!Ultimately as I have said the truth about things always comes out and things hidden exposed and depending on the seriousness of them conditioning when but in this instance it is obvious that truth in this regard is
    known as soon as possible as it affects
    your lives in a very significant way which is why I am determined that albeit in different ways it does so and why it is so important to me that it does as after all the most importantrole I played in life, the one of greatest personal significance, the one I most enjoyed was always ” Mummy! “

  18. 18
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello Everyone,

    I fully realise that at the moment of course especailly, so meaning with the current economical problems affecting people, everyone has a lot more to think about than speaking with or listening to a dead princess and whatever she might have to say, so therefore my words are to a great extent falling on deaf ears !

    Also of course there are those who perhaps for personal reasons of their own would prefer it if she had indeed gone quietly and are consequently disappointed to learn she hasn’t and won’t! Always stubborn in life, I haven’t changed in this respect actually.

    I am grateful to people like Tony who provide the vehicle so by example his site to prove this being so and my sites on the net serve to be invaluable platforms of course for me to speak from.

    In time I will be heard by a far greater audience that being the intention, the eventuality and one willing to listen as I will then be respected as perhaps holding valid insights into your world and the workings of that as well as of course offering glimpses of the workings of the one in which my higher – self now resides but as I say the appointed time for that is not now when materialistic man is still is in the midst of learning important lessons from circumstances brought largely upon himself by his own greed and ignorance.

    This again something meant to happen as of course everything in life happens for a reason and is ultimately transformative in a positive way though often being something hard to see at the time of they’re happening which is why reflection and becoming more personally encompassing of embracing fluidity of the self as opposed to rigidity is something worthy of consideration.

    I myself in a rgid environment for a while with adherence given to protocol, rules and regulations which this free – spirit fought hard against but perhaps on reflection myself now, ought actually to have been something I had been more willing to compromise with and certainly accomodate which I wasn’t and didn’t but all of us live and learn from life which is the lesson and gain wisdom from our greatest, most profound teacher … experience!”


  19. 19
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:15/12/2005 02:08:55)

    April 9th 2006 Camilla and Charles married!This being the taped conversation between H.R.H. Prince Charles and his then married mistress Camilla Parker – Bowles taped in December 1989 but only public knowledge three years later when published in the tabloids and corroborated the facts written in Andrew Morton’s book, both of which were the cause of controversy that forced the Heir to the throne to make a public declaration of his infidelity and acknowledge publicly that he and Diana were no longer living as man and wife.

    It was then obvious how mutual friends of Camilla and Charles had been involved in the conspiracy of having provided safe – houses for the couple to continue with their illicit affair, a web of deception involving even staff at ” Highgrove” being sworn to secrecy so that the princess never found out the truth. The staff caught up in the cross fire were not happy about it at all but their jobs depending on their loyalty and Diana still trying to win her husbands attention and indeed affections but resulting in alienating Charles further from her, resenting and even hating her!

    Diana would later publicly speak about everything on her television interview for ” Panorama ” in November 1995 which would result in the Queen’s ordering the Prince and Princess to divorce.

    On July 15th 1996 they were granted a decree nisi and six weeks later on August 28th 1996, being granted the decree absolute.

    Camillagate Tape

    CHARLES: I want to feel my way along you, all over you.

    CAMILLA: Oh, that’s just what I need at the moment.

    CHARLES: Is it ?

    CAMILLA: I know it would revive me. I can’t bear a sunday night without you.

    CHARLES: Oh God.

    CAMILLA: It’s like that programme ” Start the week “. I can’t start the week without you.

    CHARLES: I fill your tank!

    CAMILLA: Yes, You do!

    CHARLES: What about me? The trouble is I need you several times a week.

    CAMILLA: Mmmm. So do I. I need you all the week, all the time.

    CHARLES: Oh God. I’ll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier.

    CAMILLA: ( Laughing ) What are you going to turn into? A pair of knickers? ( They both laugh ) Oh, you’re going to come back as a pair of knickers.

    CHARLES: Oh God forbid, a Tampax, just my luck. ( Laughs )

    CAMILLA: You are a complete idiot! ( Laughs ) Oh, what a wonderful idea!

    CHARLES: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever swirling round on the top, never going down!

    CAMILLA: Oh darling!

    CHARLES: Until the next one comes through.

    CAMILLA: Or perhaps you could just come back as a box.

    CHARLES: What sort of box?

    CAMILLA: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going.

    CHARLES: That’s true.

    Their taped conversation given the name ” Camillagate “continues with Charles and she arranging to see eachother at a mutual friend’s house away from her children and whilst her husband Andrew is away in London.

    The international press went wild with the release of these tapes, Charles lost face with the public being severely criticised, Camilla had her life threatened as the most loathed woman in the U.K. and possibly the world with Diana getting the sympathy vote and winning even more adulation than she already courted.

    Prime Minister John Major addressing the House of Commons with the announcement of the official separation of the Prince and Princess of Wales. The year being 1992 and one which the Queen publicly stated had been her ” Annus Horribilis. ”

    The year having seen the marital separations for three of her four children and the scandals that this had brought upon the ” House of Windsor! “It was well known in social circles that Andrew Parker – Bowles himself a philanderer and then wife Camilla now H.R.H.Duchess of Cornwall and married to H.R.H. Prince Charles had an open marriage and Andrew a friend of Charles proud that his wife was mistress of the Prince of Wales!

    The precis below an illustration of this and his willing complicity in the arrangement whilst Charles and Diana were married! ……

    In June 1990 Charles recovering from a broken arm had wanted the only woman in his life to be comforting him, his mistress Camilla who helped him in his convalescence at “Highgrove” whilst his wife Diana stayed in London.( For years Camilla had secret –off-the-record telephone conversations with the editor of the Sun newspaper, Stuart Higgins -

    A curious relationship which illustrated the web of understanding and complicity in the circle around Charles.’I didn’t sense that she and the Prince were out of touch,’ Higgins recalled. ‘ I talked to her once a week about Diana and Charles. She guided me on things that were not true or things that were off the beam.’He would run stories past her as a check and he could hear her, hand half- cupped over the receiver, repeating them to her husband. ‘ Guess what they’re saying about us now, Andrew,’ she would call out, and even the tabloid editor was astonished by their openness about her affair with Charles. )

    (“Squidgygate”) – a name coined by The Sun newspaper – was the publication by tabloid newspapers in the 1993 of taped telephone conversations between The Princess of Wales and James Gilbey.

    Publication of the tapes was a highpoint of the “War of the Waleses” and accelerated the separation and eventual divorce of The Prince and Princess of Wales.In the conversation, the Princess of Wales, likens her situation to that of a character in the popular British soap opera EastEnders and expresses concern that she might be pregnant.

    Supporters of H.R.H. Prince of Wales used the tapes in the media to smear the Princess of Wales, who had until then been widely regarded as the wronged party in the breakdown of the marriage. However, the publication of the tapes, if anything, had the effect of increasing sympathy for the princess, the revelation that she followed a popular soap presenting the image of a far more worldly person compared with the formal and often detached public image of the Prince of Wales.

    The fact that the tapes were the result of a bugging operation by a faction or group of individuals within the British intelligence agencies also reinforced popular beliefs that the Princess of Wales was being persecuted by the establishment.

    This view influenced the conspiracy theory that the death of Diana, Princess of Wales in Paris in 1997 was an assassination rather than an accident. Whatever negative impact (“Squidgygate”) might have had for the Princess of Wales was soon balanced by the publication of taped phone conversations between the Prince of Wales and as then Camilla Parker-Bowles(Camillagate) which were very damaging to the public perception of his character and a source of much ridicule of them both!

    Diana is remembered and associated with these three powerful symbols, a candle, a heart and a rose. As a way shower in many arenas, hers was a guiding light and she clearly worked from the heart in her involvement in the causes she became involved with helping and she had beauty like a rose and proved also to having thorns so the most applicable flower of representation for ” Diana, Princess of Wales “.

  20. 20
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    Queen’s Eulogy to Diana.

    Date Posted:21/11/2005 21:54:38)

    Tony Blair, the P.M. insisted for the sake of the people the Queen made a speech!

    Since last sundays dreadful news, we have seenthroughout Britain and around the world an overwhelming expession of sadness at Diana’s death. We have all been trying in our different ways to cope. It is not easy to express a sense of loss, since the initial shock is often succeeded by a mixture of other feelings, disbelief, incomprehension, anger and concern for those who remain. We have all felt these emotions in these last few days. So what I say to you now as your Queen and as a grandmother, I say from my heart. First I want to pay tribute to Diana myself, she was an exceptional and gifted human being. In good times and bad, she never lost her capacity to smile and laugh, nor to inspire others with her warmth and kindness. I admired and respected her for her devotion and commitment to others and for her devotion to her two boys. This week in Balmoral, we have all been trying to help William and Harry come to terms with the loss that they and the rest of us have suffered. No one who knew Diana will ever forget her, millions of others who never met her but felt they knew her will remember her. I for one believe there are lessons to be learnt from her life and from the extraordinary and moving reaction to her death. I share in your determination to cherish her memory. This is also an opportunity for me on behalf of my family and especially Prince Charles and William and Harry to thank all of you who have paid your respects in so many ways to a remarkable person.They have been a huge source of help and comfort. Our thoughts are also with Diana’s family and the families of those who died with her. I know they too have drawn strength from what has happened sincelast weekend and they seek to heal their sorrow and then to face the future without a loved one. I hope that tomorrow we can all, wherever we are, join in expressing our grief at Diana’s loss and gratitude for her all-too-short life. It is a chance to show to the world the British nation united in grief and respect.. May those who died rest in peace and may we, each and every one of us thank God for someone who made many, many people happy.Queen Elizabeth ll.

    After death in Paris … August 31st 1997 The Princess’s body was subsequently repatriated to Great Britain in the evening of Sunday, 31 August by a BAe 146 aircraft of the Royal Squadron. The Prince of Wales and the Princess’s elder sisters, Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Lady Jane Fellowes, accompanied the Princess’s coffin on its return journey. Upon arrival at RAF Northolt, the coffin, draped with a Royal Standard, was removed from the aircraft and transferred to a waiting hearse by a bearer party from The Queen’s Colour Squadron of the RAF. The Prime Minister was among those in the reception party.From RAF Northolt the coffin was taken to a private mortuary in London. Shortly after midnight, it was moved to the Chapel Royal in St James’s Palace, where it was lying privately until the funeral on Saturday, 6th September in Westminster Abbey.

    Following the funeral, the coffin was moved by road to the family estate at Althorp for a private interment.

    Funeral Arrangements

    The funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales took place on Saturday, 6th September, at 11.00 a.m. at Westminster Abbey.

    Procession to Westminster Abbey. The Princess’s coffin was moved from the Chapel Royal on Friday night to her apartment at Kensington Palace. The funeral procession left Kensington Palace on Saturday morning taking the following route: Palace Avenue, Kensington High Street, Queen’s Gate (past the Albert Memorial) Carriage Road, through the archway next to Apsley House,Hyde Park Corner,Under Wellington Arch,Constitution Hill, The Mall.Those walking in the procession behind the coffin joined the cortege at the junction with Marlborough Road. The cortege was joined by the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince William, Prince Harry, Prince Charles and Earl Spencer at St James’s Palace.

    Horse Guards Road, Horse Guards Parade and Horse Guards Arch. Whitehall, Parliament Street,Parliament Square (East Side), Broad Sanctuary.

    Funeral Service

    The Princess’s family and the Royal family were seated in the front rows. A large screen outside the Abbey and two in Hyde Park allowed those outside to watch the service. At the end of the service, members of the Princess’s family and members of the Royal family accompanied the coffin in Procession down the Centre Aisle and through the Great West door to the hearse.

    The many people unable to attend the service itself were able to share in the remembrance of the Princess, as there was be a one-minute silence after the service and before the coffin left the Abbey.

    Westminster Abbey to Althorp. The funeral cortege left for Althorp by road.

    Members of the Princess’s family and members of the Royal family traveled to Northamptonshire separately.

    The route followed by the cortege was: Constitution Hill, Apsley Way(Wellington Arch), Hyde Park Corner, Park Lane, Cumberland Gate, Tyburn Way, Marble Arch, Oxford Street, Portman Street, Gloucester Place,Park Road (NW8), Wellington Road (A41),Finchley Road (A41),Hendon Way (A41)(To Brent Cross Flyover), North Circular Road (A406)(To Staples Corner)M1 (Junction 1)M1, (Junction 15A).

    Commital and Interment. The coffin was interred privately on the family estate at Althorp, late on the same day as the funeral. Family Mourning was being observed by members of the Royal family and by their Households up to and including the day of the funeral.

    (Those in uniform were wearing mourning bands; those in civilian clothing were wearing black ties and dark colours.)

    Flags were being flown at half-mast up to and including the day of the funeral.

  21. 21
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    (Date Posted:24/10/2005 21:34:46)

    Diana a keen correspondent wrote private notes about things that personally affected her and the most famous being her fear of being murdered and written by her less than a year before she died as the result of a car crash on August 31st 1997 in Paris……………………..” This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous. ” X ” (Diana writing a name which cannot be revealed for legal reasons) is planning “an accident ” in my car, brake failure and serious head injury to make the path clear for Charles to marry.

    “On the day following the official divorce from the Prince of Wales…

    “I have been battered, bruised and abused mentally by a system for 15 years now but I feel no resentment, I carry no hatred. I am weary of the battles but I will never surrender. I am strong inside and maybe that is a problem for my enemies. Thank you Charles for putting me through such hell and for giving me the opportunity to learn from the cruel things you have done to me. I have gone forward fast and have cried more than anyone will ever know. The anguish nearly killed me but my inner strength has never let me down and my guides have taken such good care of me up there. Aren’ t I fortunate to have their wings to protect me. ”

    Diana’s feelings for the Queen and the Monarchy…

    “I just long to hug my mother – in – law and tell her how deeply I understand what goes on inside her. I so want the monarchy to survive and realise the changes that it will take to put the show on a new and healthy track. I too understand the fear the family must have about change but we must to reassure the public as their indifference concerns me. I will fight for justice and will fight for my children and the monarchy.”

    Diana also found particular philosophical statements being of great personal comfort to her and giving her strength..

    ” Be more concerned with your character than your reputation because your character is what you really are while your reputation is merely what others think you are.”” The self must know stillness before it can discover its true song.”

    “Success is the result of good judgement. Good judgement is the result of experience. Experience is the result of bad judgement.”

    “Use problems as opportunities to change our lives. Problems call forth our courage and wisdom.”

    “Learn to adapt yourself to the demands of such a creative time. From a correct relationship to yourself comes a right relationship to all others and to the divine.”

    “There needs to be a meeting of heart and mind which allows one to love and let go.”

    On the night of the Royal Divorce granted, Diana penned these sentiments….

    “It’s the 28th August 1996 —– 15 years of marriage have now been signed off. I never wanted a divorce and always dreamed of a happy marriage with loving support from Charles.

    Although that was never meant to be, we do have two wonderful boys who are deeply loved by their parents. A part of me will always love Charles but how I wish he’d looked after me and been proud of my work.

    It has been a turbulent 15 years having to face the envy, jealousy, hatred from Charles’s friends and family, they have so misunderstood me and that has been painful and brought enormous heartache.

    I want so much to become Charles’s best friend as I understand more than anyone what he is about and what makes him tick!”


  22. 22
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    Date Posted:24/10/2005 19:46:55)

    Once Diana and Charles were officially separated the palace swung into action to do all it could to discredit her publicly and to destroy her credibility and destroy her popularity which had become overwhelming and in its power threatening to the royals who themselves did not court such warmth and genuine affection and love from the people, something Diana, Princess of Wales achieved with such ease all over the world.

    Incredibly the person who was held responsible for this was Sir Robert Fellowes, the Queen’s private secretary and married to Diana’s sister Jane. Stories were deliberately leaked to the newspapers of her being mentally unstable, irrational, unreasonable, hysterical and a danger to the future of the monarchy.

    The object being to enhance the reputation and image of the Prince of Wales who walked in the shadows as his glamorous wife shone in the spotlight of world attention. Diana having friends in all walks of life included certain media people who informed her personally of events, members of Charles’s circle of friends calling them with anecdotes of her madness!

    Diana herself calling her husband and advising him to call the papers himself and he of course denying all knowledge of what she was accusing his friends of having done but Diana was no fool!

    The royals themselves shut Diana out, the Queen inviting her eldest sons mistress Camilla with her husband Andrew Parker -Bowles to share the Royal Box at Ascot. and Prince Philip penning Diana a vile letter as she had previously received from her brother and which had closed communication between them and would remain closed until her death.

    Prince Philip accused Diana of being responsible for driving Charles into Camilla’s arms, that she’d not been a caring wife and whilst a good mother, too possessive of her sons though adding he couldn’t imagine anyone in their right mind leaving her for Camilla!

    He also told her that her jealousy had eaten away at the marriage with also her irrational behaviour after William’s birth not helping, this being his insensitivity to her very real problems of post – natal depression and bulimia and that she’d not appreciated Charles initially cutting the ties with his mistress possibly in explanation for his renewing them.

    He wrote also of how disappointed he and the Queen were that both she and Charles had taken lovers which given his history of mistress figures within his own marriage was as hypocritical as her brothers eulogy to Diana at her funeral had been, he having written so visciously to her himself a matter of months before her death.

    Even before her burial ripping the Royal Standard off her coffin as it had been draped in from Westminster Abbey to Althorp and replacing it with the family flag declaring ” She’s a Spencer now “.

    This having been an honoury gesture made to her in deathby the royals to be ultimately denied her as a final humiliation by her own brothers hand. The 1981 wedding dress that she’d wished to be displayed in the “National Dress Collection” at the Victoria and Albert Museum in Knightsbridge, London he’d decided would take pride of place in the museum to her memory on the Spencer estate where it can be viewed today.

    Princess Margaret one time closest of the royals to Diana now snubbed her and worse Diana’s maternal grandmother, Lady Fermoy whose loyalty always lay with the royals more than that of her own family being employed by and a friend of the Queen Mother visited Charles to express her sympathy for him and apologising for her granddaughter’s ingratitude towards him.

    Diana was aware that staff were not loyal to her, not telling them until the last minute where she might be going and yet upon arrival wherever it might be to be greeted by a waiting press, Diana firing a chauffeur she suspected of dis-loyalty.

    Diana a patron of over a hundred charities made over 200 appearances representing the royals at venues selected by them, her words monitored and restrictions imposed upon her decided to relieve herself of the workload under these new circumstances wanting to be able to spend more time with her boys than time had previously allowed her to do knowing they’d need her to be there for them now more than ever.

    Later a major factor why she did not press for divorce being that she was very frightened to lose custody of her sons as her own mother had experienced on her divorce from Diana’s father.

    Diana was also aware that following the publication of the Morton book, Prince Charles had agreed to full co – operation with a television interview and biography by Jonathan Dimbleby where he’d have his say!

    Diana removed traces of his presence at Kensington Palace and kept company with a few tried and trusted friends, keeping busy attending functions for her favourite charities that she’d remained patron of, gym workouts, letter – writing, swimming, watching tv and videos or reading a good book and giving private dinner – parties became her new life except on the school holidays when as much time as she had would be given tothe Princes William and Harry, they always being her first priority.

    There would be trips to amusement parks,museums, exhibitions, the cinema and to the stores to treat them!

    Photographs of her meant lucrative business so she found herself beseiged everywhere, bodyguards seen in cars with her being reported as new men in her life in the headlines, at times the paparazzi literally mobbed her and stalked her in cars and onmotorcyles, long range lenses used to spy on her sunbathing on a beach and pouncing on her outside restaurants from behind bushes or doorways to capture her image.

    Often as ridiculous as it looked, in desperation Diana would walk with a bag infront of her face and then be verbally insulted by them, frustrated in their attempts to stalk her successfully with a decent picture for their trouble.

    At times their cruelty and disrespect of her leading her to breakdown and beg them to leave her alone, pleas that went unheard.

    Diana had wrongly thought separation from the Prince of Wales might have gained her a greater degree of privacy and was mortified to finding this not so but to the contrary the interest in her even more intense.

    Diana’s face spelt money and was an instant sell-out if it featured on a magazine cover in ways that no previous royal had ever been seen to do which did nothing to increase her popularity within the royal household who felt even more eclipsed by her celebrity.

    Then her ex lovers book by Anna Pasternak was published telling all about the James Hewitt affair which until then had been hidden from the public, James Hewitt having made it a sensational expose and the palace even suspecting of her co – operation with it which made her determined to gather the only power she knew she had, People – Power on her side which she’d do by speaking to them herself using the media.

    Before the “Panorama” interview in which this was done, the Dimbleby interview was given, one in which the Prince of Wales publicly admiited adultry with Mrs. Camilla Parker – Bowles followed by the book but the revelations got Diana the sympathy vote, Camilla a divorce and the Queen and Prince Philip furious so doing few favours for the Prince of Wales himself, the public shocked he could dump gorgeous Diana for frumpy Camilla?

    Diana then secretly did her interview only telling Sir Robert Fellowes about it less than a week before it would be televised, he panicked as she told him that neither the Queen or Prince Charles were aware of it, it was unheard of that a member of royalty give a public interview and that the television company sanction it before agreement from the palace to do so.

    The palace put pressure on the BBC for it to not be televised but were not successful and Diana made herself physically scarce to avoid ‘phone calls she’d known to expect urging her to personally request its cancellation.

    The programme claimed a large audience and resulted ultimately in the official separation of the Prince and Princess of Wales ending in divorce!

  23. 23
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    How odd it has been reported that people ie police in France and establishment in the U.K. WERE NOT aware of Diana being in Paris when she ‘phoned a journalist friend for the Daily Mail from there … her last call!

    Date Posted:17/10/2005 19:46:55)

    The last person the late princess spoke to on the telephone from Paris was friend and journalist from the ” Daily Mail”, Richard Kay ………………….Six hours before the ” Princess of Wales ” and the man she loved were killed, she telephoned me from Paris. Diana told me she had decided to radically change her life. She was going to complete her obligations to her charities and to the anti-personnel landmines cause and then around November, would completely withdraw from her formal public life.

    She would then she said be able to live as she’d always wanted to live, not as an icon – how she hated to be called one – but as a private person.

    It was a dream sequence I’d heard from her before but this time I knew she meant it! In my view as someone close to the princess for almost five years, Dodi was a significant figure in that decision, she was in love with him and perhaps more important, she believed that he was in love with her and that he believed in her.

    They were to use an old cliche, blissfully happy. I cannot say that they would have married but in my view it was likely. None of this would mean, she explained, an end to the good works that had become so closely identified with her.

    Dodi’s father Mohammed al – Fayed had agreed to help finance a charity for the victims of mines and with Dodi’s encouragement she also had sketched out a framework of a plan to open hospices for the dying all over the world.

    And yet, in the midst of all this excitement, she suddenly said, ” But I sometimes wonder what’s the point? Whatever I do, it’s never good enough for some people:” …..

    There was a sigh and a silence. At the other end of the line was not so much a princess as a little girl who had unburdened herself and was waiting for words of comfort and understanding.

    Diana knew that whatever I said and whatever I might write it would always be what I thought and sometimes, necessarily it would be critical. So she trusted me and revealed herself constantly as a person completely unrecognisable to her most vocal critics, many of whom had never even met her!

    They saw a scheming manipulator, a plotter shrieking for attention and demanding the world’s approval and understanding. I knew a girl of utter simplicity even naivety, frightened, uncertain and delightful company when off duty.

    She asked me why the media was so anti-Dodi.. ” Is it because he’s a millionaire? she suggested hesitantly. You cannot be a manipulator and ask a serious question like that.

    Anyway I told her it had nothing to do with his money and was more involved with his father’s controversial image. Diana listened ” Hmmm”.

    Maybe for once she thought I was being diplomatically evasive. It seemed to me that she actually believed that in a world filled with the disadvantaged, being rich might be something to be ashamed of…… but this was a princess who understood so little about that aspect of the real world she left behind in 1981 that the first time she insisted on paying for two coffees in an anonymous cafe where we had met for a chat, away from prying eyes, she tried to leave a ?.00 tip on top of a ?.00 bill.

    Suddenly she brightened and we switched subjects to her boys, ” William” and “Harry”…… “I’m coming home tomorrow and the boys will be back from Scotland in the evening” she said, ” I will have a few days with them before they’re back at school.”…….

    It may sound thoroughly irrelevant to reiterate what was obvious to everyone, her devotion to her sons but the significance lay in their uncomplicated love for her.

    Diana was a bit troubled because “William” had called her to say that he was required by Buckingham Palace to perform – they wanted him to carry out a photo call at Eton where he was due to begin his third year that following week. What troubled Diana and indeed William was that the spotlight was being shone on William ,15 yrs old and not his twelve year old brother Harry, she and her eldest son having talked to eachother all about her holiday with Dodi and theirs with their father and how excited Harry and he were to be seeing her again the next day and Diana excited always missing her boys when parted from them.The princess had told me on a previous occasion how hard it was for Harry being overshadowed as a second son by William and said she tried to ensure as far as possible that everything was shared -

    a point endorsed by Prince Charles. In her two sons -and latterly Dodi – she saw the only men in her life who had never let her down and never wanted anything from her except her being herself!

    It was on a return flight from Nepal early in 1993 that the princess and I had our first serious and lengthy conversation. We had a number of mutual friends and I had met her on several previous occasions. We talked about her trip, her children, her family and mine. It was the start of what became a friendship based on one crucial element – her complete understanding that I as a journalist would never sacrifice my impartiality, especially where it concerned her acrimonious differences with the Prince of Wales and certain members of the royal family.

    Competitors and some royal advisers frequently suggested that I was in her pocket and there was that picture of me getting outof her car in Beauchamp Place, Knightsbridge, snapped inevitably by a paparazzo.

    Over the years I saw her at her happiest and in her darkest moments. There were moments of confusion and despair when I believe Diana was driven by the incredible pressures made on her almost to the point of destruction. I knew from the outset that her mines campaign would cause her as much distress as satisfaction, as her simple notion of using her fame to save lives was thrown inher face by politicians who accused her of embarrassing the government by meddling in things she didn’t fully understand. ……

    “What is there to understand when people are having their legs blown off? … she asked me on many occasions.

    Diana talked of being strengthened by events and anyone could see how the bride of twenty had grown into a mature woman but I never found her strong, she was as unsure of herself at her death as when I first talked with her on that aircraft and she wanted reassurance about the role she was creating for herself. In private she was acompletely different person from the manicured clothes horse that the public’s insatiable demand for icons had created.

    Diana was natural and witty and did a wonderful impression of the “Queen.” This was the person she would have been she told me if she hadn’t married into the world’s most famous family.

    Just before last Christmas ( 1996 ), I lunched with her at a friend’s house in Hampstead. We ate vegetable curry with rice and drank still water, Diana was intoxicating company, she never needed on that day or any carefree day with friends for that matter, the fortification of alcohol.

    After lunch she helped clean the table and stacked the dishwasher, soaked the pans and wiped the table with a damp cloth. The four of us went for a walk on Hampstead Heath, we were all arm in arm plodding through mud after heavy rain in ordinary shoes, laughing at the state they were in.

    People passing us could hardly believe they were seeing the most famous woman in the world entirely without public make – up, weraing jeans and ankle boots and unstyled hair in it’s usual shape .. flat!

    The simple soul who was the real Diana was already anticipating Christmas which she hated because her sons inevitably spent it with their father and the rest of the royal family, she would be alone as usual and told me she was going away to Barbuda for a few days.

    It was the solitary glum moment in a sunny afternoon and she soon shrugged it off and began to have fun.On saturday she didn’t talk much about Dodi and I understood why, she was afraid that the moment too much was read into the relationship, it would end, she always feared that the pressures of publicity would alienate any man in her life. …

    ” Who would have me with all the baggage I come with? “…. she would say to me. Diana had told me she regretted admiiting in her famous ” Panorama” interview having an affair with James Hewitt whom she had also loved. So why had she said it ?

    The answer was simplicity itself, Charles had admiited adultery on television, so why shouldn’t she ? Whatever the psychiatrists said about her bulimia and it’s roots in her disrupted childhood, Diana believed its main cause was the poor quality of life with Charles …

    ” There were three of us in this marriage so it was a bit crowded ” as she told the the Panorama ” audience.

    This made her gloomy enough and yet it never pushed her to the extremes of misery she felt when commentators and the public misunderstood what she was doing. Most of all she hated being called manipulative and privately railed against those who used the word to describe her,”They don’t even know me!” she would say bitterly sitting cross – legged on the floor of her Kensington Palace home and pouring tea from a china pot.

    It was this blindness as she saw it to what she really was that led her to seriously consider living abroad where she hoped she’d be more understood. The idea first emerged in her mind about three years ago ( 1994 ).

    Diana considered France because it was near enough to stay in close touch with William and Harry, she thought of America because she naively … it must be said – saw it as a country so brimming with glittery people and celebrities, that she would be able to disappear.

    Diana also thought of South Africa where her brother Charles had made his home and even Australia because it was the furthest place she could think of from the seat of her unhappiness but this would have separated her from her sons.

    Everyone said she would go anywhere, do anyhing to have her picture taken but in my view the truth was completely different. A good day for Diana was one where her picture was not taken and paparazzi photographers did not pusue her and climb all over her car! …

    ” Why are they so obsessed with me ? ” … she would ask me and Itried to explain but never felt that she fully understood. Millions of women dreamed of changing places with her but the princess I knew yearned for the ordinary, humdrum routine of their lives …

    ” They don’t know how lucky they are! ” she would say. On saturday just before she was joined by Dodi for that last fateful dinner at the “Ritz” in Paris, she told me how fed-up she was being compared with Camilla. …

    “It’s all so meaningless “, she said and left it at that. Diana didn’t say and never said whether she thought Charles and Camilla should marry. Then knowing that as a journalist I often work at weekends, she said to me ……. ” Unplug your ‘ phone and get a goodnights sleep.”

    They were her final words to me, uttered with the same warmth and consideration with which she wrote to my mother when my father died last December ( 1996 ) and then sent her tickets for the ballet I had told her my mother loved.

    On the saturday evening,, Diana was as happy as I’d ever known her, for the first time in years, all was well with her world.

    “Richard Kay …. Daily Mail ”

    ” I have to say albeit through Andrew I penned a note to Richard but he was non – believing of it’s being me writing to him which hurt me naturally as I had hoped he would have recognised me but I did try and hopefully one day albeit through Andrew of course we will connect again!”


  24. 24
    Andrew Russell - Davis Says:

    ” Hello,
    I sent this letter to the editors of the Daily Express this week having originally of course contacted them directly regarding the London bombings which claimed 52 innocent lives … my speaking about this to them 4 days before they happened and so far have again been similarly ignored by them but never the less I sensed a wake – up call being necessary and I think perhaps some of you might be interested in reading what I had to say and also on my site my book channeled to Andrew in 2005 can be listened to read by me albeit naturally through him so something some of you anyway might enjoy and of course all my sites are FREE … and and the Diana Speaks Out section.


    Here below is the letter to the British Newspaper .

    ” I am aware, I fully realise as has already of course been the case my writing like this to you might well be greeted by cynicism which is why I am making it clear all I say can indeed be verified in as simple a way as visiting websites and as well as of course in the search bar at YOU TUBE putting in the name Andrew Russell – Davis, a name incidentally soon to be known throughout the world for all too obvious reasons. Do your own homework and research and be amazed, it’s all real !

    Before pre – judging ask yourselves what would be the point of his putting his name out there for all to see were it not true, to wind up being as globally reviled as the likes of Saddam Hussein and Hitler, I’d hardly imagine so, for financial gain ? He’s not made a penny to date even keeping my book as one to be read or listened to freely on the net for anyone interested in doing so.

    It is simply the fact he has a job to do and is doing it and now is the time to make it known what exactly his job is so that in the future when it becomes something believed in and deemed acceptable by the majority, people like yourselves will have been previously informed about it so needless to say I am not writing to you now in expectation of a reply … you have been contacted before, the purpose in my writing is to make you aware of something pretty phenomenal ahead of it’s happening on a global scale though already it is something becoming public knowledge via the internet. ”

    A copy of this letter to you has likewise been published on the net as with there being no deception involved, there’s nothing to hide!

    Thank you for listening to me.

  25. 25
    Horace Says:

    I love what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and reporting!
    Keep up the good works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my own blogroll.

  26. 26
    American London Hotels ¦ Hotels in London ¦ Express American London Says:

    My partner and i take pleasure in, produce I discovered what precisely I had been looking to get. You could have ended the Some working day extended seek out! Goodness Thank you man. Have got a terrific time. Cya

  27. 27
    company Says:

    Typically I would not read through post for sites, nevertheless i wish to claim that this particular write-up incredibly compelled me personally to take a look on and also take action! Your producing preference continues to be astonished us. Thank you, very terrific article.

  28. 28
    カナダグース コート 最高級 Says:

    I’m really impressed along with your writing skills and also with the structure for
    your weblog. Is that this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?

    Anyway keep up the nice high quality writing, it is uncommon to look a nice weblog like this one today..

    Have a look at my web blog: カナダグース コート 最高級

  29. 29
    tranny webcam Says:

    Can you tell us more about this? I’d want to find out some additional

  30. 30
    steam shower installation Says:

    we not too long ago built a steam shower unit, finest item i’ve invested in
    for some time, kids and family think it’s great, can’t see everybody turning
    back to regular showers anymore

  31. 31
    wedding table plan, wedding table plans, wedding table plan ideas, wedding seating plans, seating plan ideas, seating plan etiquette Says:

    You can certainly visit your comprehension of the actual pictures you’re posting. The globe desires of much more zealous freelancers just like you who seem to are certainly not scared to say the direction they imagine. Constantly focus on the coronary heart.

  32. 32
    building inspections Says:

    building inspections…

    The Unorthodox Website Blog » Blog Archive » Diana, the revolutionary princess…

  33. 33
    Pocket legends cheats Says:

    After the 1990s, Taiwan footwear manufacturing total costs have increased,
    Yu Yuan Group controlled by Pou Chen Group builds its primary
    manufacturing foundation in China mainland in Dong Guan and Gaobu of the
    Pearl River Delta region to maintain the strength of low-cost producing.
    Sepandan, tes rapid sa yo ap konsidere kom pa serye ase pou an sekirite yon rezilta pozitif
    nan plis de sa, se yon echantiyon san pran konfime rezilta an.
    Investing in your company’s retirement plan is one option but there are other

Leave a Reply

© 2014 The Unorthodox Website Blog | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Your Index Web Directorywordpress logo

Bad Behavior has blocked 1770 access attempts in the last 7 days.